Cited by 148Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

Outcomes of the Bobath concept on upper limb recovery following stroke

Luke, Carolyn, Dodd, Karen J, Brock, Kim·2004·Clinical Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of the Bobath concept at reducing upper limb impairments, activity limitations and participation restrictions after stroke. Methods: Electronic databases were searched to identify relevant trials published between 1966 and 2003. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for the following inclusion criteria: population of adults with upper limb disability after stroke; stated use of the Bobath concept aimed at improving upper limb disability in isolation from other approaches; outcomes reflecting changes in upper limb impairment, activity limitation or participation restriction. Results: Of the 688 articles initially identified, eight met the inclusion criteria. Five were randomized controlled trials, one used a single-group crossover design and two were single-case design studies. Five studies measured impairments including shoulder pain, tone, muscle strength and motor control. The Bobath concept was found to reduce shoulder pain better than cryotherapy, and to reduce tone compared to no intervention and compared to proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF). However, no difference was detected for changes in tone between the Bobath concept and a functional approach. Differences did not reach significance for measures of muscle strength and motor control. Six studies measured activity limitations, none of these found the Bobath concept was superior to other therapy approaches. Two studies measured changes in participation restriction and both found equivocal results. Conclusions: Comparisons of the Bobath concept with other approaches do not demonstrate superiority of one approach over the other at improving upper limb impairment, activity or participation. However, study limitations relating to methodological quality, the outcome measures used and contextual factors investigated limit the ability to draw conclusions. Future research should use sensitive upper limb measures, trained Bobath therapists and homogeneous samples to identify the influence of patient factors on the response to therapy approaches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1191/0269215504cr793oa

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luke, C., Dodd, K. J., & Brock, K.
Affiliations
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Clinical Rehabilitation
Published
2004-12
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
888-898
ISSN
  • 0269-2155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0873
OpenAlex
W2166987927
Cited by
148
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Keywords
Bobath concept, stroke, upper limb recovery, upper limb impairment, activity limitation, participation restrictions, shoulder pain, spasticity, muscle tone, muscle strength, motor control, cryotherapy, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, stroke rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Humans, Recovery of Function, Stroke, Physical Therapy Modalities, Upper Extremity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review