Cited by 96

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Time's arrow, time's cycle: Granulite metamorphism and geodynamics

Brown, Michael, Johnson, Tim·2019·Mineralogical Magazine

Abstract

Although the thermal evolution of the mantle before c. 3.0 Ga remains unclear, since c. 3.0 Ga secular cooling has dominated over heat production—this is time's arrow. By contrast, the thermal history of the crust, which is preserved in the record of metamorphism, is more complex. Heat to drive metamorphism is generated by radioactive decay and viscous dissipation, and is augmented by the influx of heat from the mantle. Notwithstanding that reliable data are sparse before the Neoarchean, we use a dataset of temperature (T), pressure (P) and thermobaric ratio (T/P at the metamorphic ‘peak’), and age of metamorphism (t, the timing of the metamorphic ‘peak’) for rocks from 564 localities ranging in age from the Cenozoic to the Eoarchean eras to interrogate the crustal record of metamorphism as a proxy for the heat budget of the crust through time. On the basis of T/P, metamorphic rocks are classified into three natural groups: high T/P type (T/P >775°C/GPa, mean T/P ~1105°C/GPa), including common and ultrahigh-temperature granulites, intermediate T/P type (T/P between 775 and 375°C/GPa, mean T/P ~575°C/GPa), including high-pressure granulites and medium- and high-temperature eclogites, and low T/P type (T/P <375°C/GPa, mean T/P ~255°C/GPa), including blueschists, low-temperature eclogites and ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic rocks. A monotonic increase in the P of intermediate T/P metamorphism from the Neoarchean to the Neoproterozoic reflects strengthening of the lithosphere during secular cooling of the mantle—this is also time's arrow. However, temporal variation in the P of intermediate T/P metamorphism and in the moving means of T and T/P of high T/P metamorphism, combined with the clustered age distribution, demonstrate the cyclicity of collisional orogenesis and cyclic variations in the heat budget of the crust superimposed on secular cooling since c. 3.0 Ga—this is time's cycle. A first cycle began with the widespread appearance/survival of intermediate T/P and high T/P metamorphism in the Neoarchean rock record coeval with amalgamation of dispersed blocks of lithosphere to form protocontinents. This cycle was terminated by the fragmentation of the protocontinents into cratons in the early Paleoproterozoic, which signalled the start of a new cycle. The second cycle continued with the progressive amalgamation of the cratons into the supercontinent Columbia and extended until the breakup of the supercontinent Rodinia in the Neoproterozoic. This cycle represented a period of relative tectonic and environmental stability, and perhaps reduced subduction during at least part of the cycle. During most of the Proterozoic the moving means for both T and T/P of high T/P metamorphism exceeded the arithmetic means, reflecting insulation of the mantle beneath the quasi-integrated lithosphere of Columbia and, after a limited reorganisation, Rodinia. The third cycle began with the steep decline in thermobaric ratios of high T/P metamorphism to their lowest value, synchronous with the breakup of Rodinia and the formation of Pannotia, and the widespread appearance/preservation of low T/P metamorphism in the rock record. The thermobaric ratios for high T/P metamorphism rise to another peak associated with the Pan-African event, again reflecting insulation of the mantle. The subsequent steep decline in thermobaric ratios of high T/P metamorphism associated with the breakup of Pangea at c. 0.175 Ga may indicate the start of a fourth cycle. The limited occurrence of high and intermediate T/P metamorphism before the Neoarchean suggests either that suitable tectonic environments to generate these types of metamorphism were not widely available before then or that the rate of survival was low. We interpret the first cycle to record stabilisation of subduction and the emergence of a network of plate boundaries in a plate tectonics regime once the balance between heat production and heat loss changed in favour of secular cooling, possibly as early as c. 3.0 Ga in some areas. This is inferred to have been a globally linked system by the early Paleoproterozoic, but whether it remained continuous to the present is unclear. The second cycle was characterised by stability from the formation of Columbia to the breakup of Rodinia, generating higher than average T and T/P of high T/P metamorphism. The third cycle reflects colder collisional orogenesis and deep subduction of the continental crust, features that are characteristic of modern plate tectonics, which became possible once the average temperature of the asthenospheric mantle had declined to <100°C warmer than the present day after c. 1.0 Ga.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1180/mgm.2019.19

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The P-T estimates for the High-P segments of the hinterland are in the intermediate dT/dP field which is inferred to represent mountain belts in collisional settings.

    “The P-T estimates for the High-P segments of the hinterland are in the intermediate dT/dP field (Fig. 5) which is inferred to represent mountain belts in collisional settings (Brown and Johnson 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 84

  1. 10.1086/341595 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00261-9 · DOI
  3. 10.1130/G40254.1 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/petrology/egq066 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/ngeo2904 · DOI
  6. 2014, Gondwana Research, 28, 534
  7. 10.1146/annurev-earth-042711-105255 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.11.035 · DOI
  9. 1968, Metamorphic Petrology
  10. 10.1016/j.tecto.2009.03.008 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.precamres.2006.12.011 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.06.032 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.12.015 · DOI
  14. 1985, The Continental Crust: Its Composition and Evolution
  15. 10.2138/am-2018-6166 · DOI
  16. 2007, Geodynamics of the Lithosphere, 2nd Edition
  17. 10.1016/j.gsf.2014.02.005 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/0040-1951(94)00282-E · DOI
  19. 10.2747/0020-6814.49.3.193 · DOI
  20. 2006, Tectonics, 25, 1
  21. 10.1130/G22853A.1 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/s41561-017-0051-y · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0264-3707(01)00018-7 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/petrology/egr010 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.gr.2012.12.011 · DOI
  26. 10.1130/G40246.1 · DOI
  27. 2012, Precambrian Research, 222–223, 77
  28. 10.1093/petroj/40.12.1747 · DOI
  29. Percival, 2012, Tectonic Styles in Canada: The LITHOPROBE Perspective, 97
  30. 10.12789/geocanj.2014.41.057 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/0012-821X(79)90023-2 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.tecto.2017.07.020 · DOI
  33. 10.1130/G25031A.1; · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.gsf.2017.06.001 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.precamres.2013.05.014 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 2009, Principles of Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology (2nd Edition)
  37. 10.1046/j.1525-1314.2003.00420.x · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1038/srep26359 · DOI
  39. 10.1144/gsjgs.150.2.0227 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.08.001 · DOI
  41. 2003, 35 pieces. Lithos, 71, 99
  42. 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.12.018 · DOI
  43. 10.1086/345842 · DOI
  44. 10.2113/gselements.9.6.433 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.002 · DOI
  46. 10.3749/canmin.48.4.711 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.07.003 · DOI
  48. 2019, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 470
  49. 10.1130/G45225.1 · DOI
  50. 10.1093/petrology/2.3.277 · DOI
  51. 2018, Journal of Metamorphic Geology
  52. 2017, Lithos, 272–273, 128
  53. 10.1038/ngeo2862 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.epsl.2007.05.046 · DOI
  55. 2012, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 321–322, 115
  56. 10.1016/j.precamres.2008.10.004 · DOI
  57. Gee, 2006, European Lithosphere Dynamics, 561
  58. 10.1016/j.tecto.2016.11.041 · DOI
  59. 2019, Global age, temperature and pressure data for secular change in metamorphism
  60. 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.10.028 · DOI
  61. 10.1111/jmg.12049 · DOI
  62. 10.1002/2016JB013850 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.gsf.2014.09.006 · DOI
  64. Brown, 2006, Evolution and Differentiation of the Continental Crust, 268
  65. 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.10.022 · DOI
  66. 10.1038/ngeo2019 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.lithos.2016.07.017 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.09.047 · DOI
  69. 10.1098/rstb.2006.1838 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 2007, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 8, Q02006
  71. 10.1126/science.1168549 · DOI
  72. 10.2465/jmps.160128 · DOI
  73. Treloar, 1998, What Drives Metamorphism and Metamorphic Relations?, 81
  74. 1987, Time's Arrow, Time's Cycle: Myth and Metaphor in the Discovery of Geological Time
  75. 10.1016/j.gsf.2014.03.001 · DOI
  76. 10.1144/gsjgs.134.2.0201 · DOI
  77. 10.1098/rsta.1987.0001 · DOI
  78. 10.1130/B25903.1 · DOI
  79. 10.1016/j.precamres.2012.11.009 · DOI
  80. 10.2113/gssajg.117.1.31 · DOI
  81. 10.1016/j.precamres.2006.07.007 · DOI
  82. 10.2113/gselements.7.4.235 · DOI
  83. 2019, Journal of Metamorphic Geology
  84. 10.1038/ngeo3010 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brown, M., & Johnson, T.
Venue
Mineralogical Magazine
Published
2019-04-12
Volume
83
Issue
03
Pages
323-338
ISSN
  • 0026-461X
  • 1471-8022
Cited by
96
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review