CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 975

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nomenclature of Amphiboles; Report of the Subcommittee on Amphiboles of the International Mineralogical Association Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names

Leake, Bernard E., Woolley, Alan R., Arps, C. E. S., Birch, W. D., Gilbert, M. C., Grice, J. D., Hawthorne, F. C., Kato, A., Kisch, H. J., Krivovichev, V. G., Linthout, K., Laird, J., Mandarino, J., Maresch, W. V., Nickel, E. H., Rock, N. M. S., Schumacher, J. C., Smith, D. C., Stephenson, N. C. N., Ungaretti, L., Whittaker, E. J. W., Youzhi, G.·1997·Mineralogical Magazine
DOI 10.1180/minmag.1997.061.405.13
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The International Mineralogical Association's approved amphibole nomenclature has been revised in order to simplify it, make it more consistent with divisions generally at 50%, define prefixes and modifiers more precisely and include new amphibole species discovered and named since 1978, when the previous scheme was approved. The same reference axes form the basis of the new scheme and most names are little changed but compound species names like tremolitic hornblende (now magnesiohornblende) are abolished and also crossite (now glaucophane or ferroglaucophane or magnesioriebeckite or riebeckite), tirodite (now manganocummingtonite) and dannemorite (now manganogrunerite). The 50% rule has been broken only to retain tremolite and actinolite as in the 1978 scheme so the sodic calcic amphibole range has therefore been expanded. Alkali amphiboles are now sodic amphiboles. The use of hyphens is defined. New amphibole names approved since 1978 include nyböite, leakeite, kornite, ungarettiite, sadanagaite and cannilloite. All abandoned names are listed. The formulae and source of the amphibole end member names are listed and procedures outlined to calculate Fe 3+ and Fe 2+ when not determined by analysis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1180/minmag.1997.061.405.13

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Veblen, D.R. and Ribbe, P.H. (Eds) (1982) Amphiboles: petrology and experimental phase relations. Reviews in Mineralogy, 9B. Mineral. Soc. Amer. 390 pp. · DOI
  2. Armbruster, 1993, Hennomartinite and kornite, two new Mn3+ rich silicates from the Wessels Mine, Kalahari, South Africa, Schw. Mineral. Petr. Mitt.,, 73, 349
  3. 10.1180/minmag.1984.048.347.05 · DOI
  4. Shimazaki, 1984, Sadanagaite and magnesio-sadanagaite, new silicapoor members of calcic amphibole from Japan, Amer. Mineral.,, 69, 465
  5. Chukhrov, 1981, 3. Silicates with multiple chains of Si-O tetrahedra., 397
  6. 10.1180/minmag.1978.042.324.21 · DOI
  7. 10.2138/am-1995-1-216 · DOI
  8. Deer, 1963, Rockforming Minerals, 2 Chain silicates., 379
  9. 10.1180/minmag.1988.052.365.15 · DOI
  10. 10.1515/9781501508219 · DOI
  11. 10.2138/am-1996-1-227 · DOI
  12. Ungaretti, 1981, Crystalchemistry by X-ray structure refinement and electron microprobe analysis of a series of sodic-calcic to alkali amphiboles from the Nybö eclogite pod, Norway, Bull. Mineral.,, 104, 400
  13. Anthony, 1995, Handbook of Mineralogy, 2,, 446
  14. Deer, 1997, Double-Chain silicates., 2, 772
  15. 10.2138/am-1996-7-821 · DOI
  16. Hawthorne, 1983, The crystal chemistry of the amphiboles, Canad. Mineral.,, 21, 173
  17. Nickel, 1992, Nomenclature for mineral solid solutions, Amer. Mineral.,, 77, 660
  18. Hawthorne, 1992, Leakeite, NaNa2(Mg2Fe2 3+Li)Si8O22 (OH)2, a new alkali amphibole from the Kajlidongri manganese mine, Jhabua district, Madhya Pradesh, India, Amer. Mineral.,, 77, 1112
  19. 10.1007/978-3-642-46138-5 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Leake, B. E., Woolley, A. R., Arps, C. E. S., Birch, W. D., Gilbert, M. C., Grice, J. D., Hawthorne, F. C., Kato, A., Kisch, H. J., Krivovichev, V. G., Linthout, K., Laird, J., Mandarino, J., Maresch, W. V., Nickel, E. H., Rock, N. M. S., Schumacher, J. C., Smith, D. C., Stephenson, N. C. N., Ungaretti, L., Whittaker, E. J. W., & Youzhi, G.
Venue
Mineralogical Magazine
Publisher
Mineralogical Society
Published
1997-04
Volume
61
Issue
405
Pages
295-310
ISSN
  • 0026-461X
  • 1471-8022
DOI
10.1180/minmag.1997.061.405.13
Cited by
975
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 7765 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review