Cited by 25Occupational and environmental lung diseasesTailings Management and PropertiesMineralogy and Gemology Studies

Mineralogy of mine waste at the Vermont Asbestos Group mine, Belvidere Mountain, Vermont

Levitan, D. M., Hammarstrom, J. M., Gunter, M. E., Seal, R. R., Chou, I-M., Piatak, N. M.·2009·American Mineralogist

Abstract

Samples from the surfaces of waste piles at the Vermont Asbestos Group mine in northern Vermont were studied to determine their mineralogy, particularly the presence and morphology of amphiboles. Analyses included powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), electron probe microanalysis (EPMA), and Raman spectroscopy. Minerals identified by XRD were serpentine-group minerals, magnetite, chlorite, quartz, olivine, pyroxene, and brucite; locally, mica and carbonates were also present. Raman spectroscopy distinguished antigorite and chrysotile, which could not be differentiated using XRD. Long-count, short-range XRD scans of the (110) amphibole peak showed trace amounts of amphibole in most samples. Examination of amphiboles in tailings by optical microscopy, SEM, and EPMA revealed non-fibrous amphiboles compositionally classified as edenite, magnesiohornblende, magnesiokatophorite, and pargasite. No fibrous amphibole was found in the tailings, although fibrous tremolite was identified in a sample of host rock. Knowledge of the mineralogy at the site may lead to better understanding of potential implications for human health and aid in designing a remediation plan.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2138/am.2009.3258

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Passive carbonation of ultramafic tailings has been documented at several sites under normal mining conditions.

    “As an indication of their reactivity, passive carbonation of ultramafic tailings has been documented at several sites under normal mining conditions [11,17,18,20,21,24,26,30].”

    From Strategizing carbon-neutral mines: A case for pilot projects (2014) · cites this paper as [30]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levitan, D. M., Hammarstrom, J. M., Gunter, M. E., Seal, R. R., Chou, I.-M., & Piatak, N. M.
Affiliations
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
  • University of Idaho (US)
Corresponding author
Levitan, D. M.
Venue
American Mineralogist
Published
2009-06-30
Volume
94
Issue
7
Pages
1063-1066
ISSN
0003-004X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992858556
Cited by
25
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Mineralogist (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Health, Vermont
  • U.S. Geological Survey
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Occupational and environmental lung diseases
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Tailings Management and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Mineralogy and Gemology Studies
Keywords
mining waste, mineralogy, amphibole, serpentine minerals, antigorite, chrysotile, edenite, magnesiohornblende, pargasite, tremolite, brucite, chlorite, magnetite, human health risk, remediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review