The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fibrin fragment D-dimer and the risk of future venous thrombosis
Open accessAbstract
Plasma D-dimer concentration rises more than 100-fold during acute deep vein thrombosis, but there are no prospective data concerning D-dimer as a risk factor for incident venous thrombosis in a general population. Incident venous thrombosis was ascertained in 2 prospective observational studies, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study and the Cardiovascular Health Study. Of 21 690 participants enrolled between 1987 and 1993, after 8 years of follow-up, D-dimer was measured using baseline stored plasma of 307 participants who developed venous thrombosis and 616 who did not. Relative to the first quintile of the distribution of D-dimer, the age-adjusted odds ratios for future venous thrombosis for the second to fifth quintiles of D-dimer were 1.6, 2.3, 2.3, and 4.2, respectively (P for trend < .0001). Following added adjustment for sex, race, body mass index, factor V Leiden, prothrombin 20210A, and elevated factor VIII coagulant activity (factor VIII:c), these odds ratios were 1.5, 2.1, 1.9, and 3.0, respectively (P for trend < .0001). Among those with idiopathic thrombosis or secondary thrombosis unrelated to cancer, the adjusted fifth quintile odds ratios were 3.5 and 4.8, respectively. By contrast, D-dimer in the fifth versus first quintile was not related to occurrence of cancer-associated thrombosis (odds ratio, 1.1). Odds ratios for elevated D-dimer were consistently elevated in subgroups defined by age, sex, race, duration of follow-up, and thrombosis type (deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolus). D-dimer is strongly and positively related to the occurrence of future venous thrombosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Cardiovascular Health Study: design and rationale.
Fried, L. P., Borhani, N. O., Enright, P., Furberg, C. D., Gardin, J. M., Kronmal, R. A., Kuller, L. H., Manolio, T. A., Mittelmark, M. B., Newman, A., et al. (1991) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/1047-2797(91)90005-w · Cited by 3,652
Self-citation
Cited by
The Epidemiology of Venous Thromboembolism
White, R. H. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000078468.11849.66 · Cited by 2,310
Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism
Heit, J. A. (2015) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2015.83 · Cited by 1,277
Systemic Effects of Inflammation on Health during Chronic HIV Infection
Deeks, S. G., Tracy, R., & Douek, D. C. (2013) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.001 · Cited by 868
Self-citationVenous thromboembolism: disease burden, outcomes and risk factors
HEIT, J. A. (2005) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01415.x · Cited by 447
Ay, C., Vormittag, R., Dunkler, D., Simanek, R., Chiriac, A.-L., Drach, J., Quehenberger, P., Wagner, O., Zielinski, C., & Pabinger, I. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.21.7752 · Cited by 422
Metadata
- Authors
- Cushman, M., Folsom, A. R., Wang, L., Aleksic, N., Rosamond, W. D., Tracy, R. P., & Heckbert, S. R.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2003-02-15
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1243-1248
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W2057674099
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fibrin fragment D-dimer and the risk of future venous thrombosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2002-05-1416
- The paper
- Cushman, M., Folsom, A. R., Wang, L., Aleksic, N., Rosamond, W. D., Tracy, R. P., & Heckbert, S. R. (2003). Fibrin fragment D-dimer and the risk of future venous thrombosis. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2002-05-1416
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.