Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proteomics applied to the clinical follow-up of patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Kaiser, Thorsten, Kamal, Haytham, Rank, Andreas, Kolb, Hans-Jochem, Holler, Ernst, Ganser, Arnold, Hertenstein, Bernd, Mischak, Harald, Weissinger, Eva Maria·2004·Blood

Abstract

A phase 1 diagnostic study was performed to evaluate a novel technology for clinical proteom research based on capillary electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Urine from 40 patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT; 35 allogeneic, 5 autologous) and 5 patients with sepsis was collected for a period of 100 days and analyzed. More than 1000 different polypeptides could be detected in individual samples. Polypeptide patterns excreted in the urine of patients were significantly different from those of healthy volunteers. No significant differences were detected comparing different conditioning regimens. The aim of this study was to identify polypeptide patterns functioning as early indicators of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Eighteen patients developed GVHD after allogeneic HSCT. Sixteen differentially excreted polypeptides formed a pattern of early GVHD markers, allowing discrimination of GVHD from patients without complications with 82% specificity and 100% sensitivity, cross-validated. Inclusion of 13 sepsis-specific polypeptides allowed us to distinguish sepsis from GVHD with a specificity of 97% and a sensitivity of 100%. Sequencing 2 prominent GVHD-indicative polypeptides led to the identification of a peptide from leukotriene A4 hydrolase and a peptide from serum albumin. The data reveal that capillary electrophoresis and mass spectrometry allow identification of biomarkers for a variety of diseases or related complications. (Blood. 2004;104:340-349)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2004-02-0518

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
Kaiser, T., Kamal, H., Rank, A., Kolb, H.-J., Holler, E., Ganser, A., Hertenstein, B., Mischak, H., & Weissinger, E. M.
Venue
Blood
Published
2004-07-15
Volume
104
Issue
2
Pages
340-349
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W1973437286
Cited by
163
References
1
FWCI
10.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proteomics applied to the clinical follow-up of patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2004-02-0518
The paper
Kaiser, T., Kamal, H., Rank, A., Kolb, H.-J., Holler, E., Ganser, A., Hertenstein, B., Mischak, H., & Weissinger, E. M. (2004). Proteomics applied to the clinical follow-up of patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2004-02-0518

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.