Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 371

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A uniform activated B-cell–like immunophenotype might explain the poor prognosis of primary central nervous system lymphomas: analysis of 83 cases

Camilleri-Broët, Sophie, Crinière, Emmanuelle, Broët, Philippe, Delwail, Vincent, Mokhtari, Karima, Moreau, Anne, Kujas, Michèle, Raphaël, Martine, Iraqi, Wafae, Sautès-Fridman, Catherine, Colombat, Philippe, Hoang-Xuan, Khê, Martin, Antoine·2006·Blood

Abstract

Most primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs) in immunocompetent patients are diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs), characterized by poor prognosis, compared with systemic forms. A germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) origin of PCNSL was hypothesized on the basis of BCL-6 expression and ongoing mutational activity. Our goal herein was to determine, for 83 PCNSLs, the percentages of GCB and activated B-cell-like (ABC) phenotypes and their prognostic significance. CD10, BCL-6, MUM1, BCL-2, and CD138 antigens were immunohistochemically labeled on paraffin-embedded sections; the first 4 were positive in 2.4%, 55.5%, 92.6%, and 55.5% of the tumors, respectively. None of the 56 tested samples expressed CD138. Among the 82 patients with complete information, 79 (96.3%) were classified as ABC; 42 (51.2%) expressed BCL-6+ MUM1+, suggesting an "activated GCB" origin; 33 (40.2%) were exclusively MUM1+, and the remaining 4 (4.9%) were negative for all markers tested. These findings provide new insights into interpreting the poor PCNSL prognostic, which may, in part, be due to biologic aggressiveness associated with its activated B-cell-like pattern. We postulate assigning PCNSL a histogenetic "time-slot," overlapping late GC and early post-GC, that could explain the predominant ABC phenotype observed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2005-03-1024

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Metadata

Authors
Camilleri-Broët, S., Crinière, E., Broët, P., Delwail, V., Mokhtari, K., Moreau, A., Kujas, M., Raphaël, M., Iraqi, W., Sautès-Fridman, C., Colombat, P., Hoang-Xuan, K., & Martin, A.
Venue
Blood
Published
2005-12-22
Volume
107
Issue
1
Pages
190-196
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2129831897
Cited by
371
References
27
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A uniform activated B-cell–like immunophenotype might explain the poor prognosis of primary central nervous system lymphomas: analysis of 83 cases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2005-03-1024
The paper
Camilleri-Broët, S., Crinière, E., Broët, P., Delwail, V., Mokhtari, K., Moreau, A., Kujas, M., Raphaël, M., Iraqi, W., Sautès-Fridman, C., Colombat, P., Hoang-Xuan, K., & Martin, A. (2006). A uniform activated B-cell–like immunophenotype might explain the poor prognosis of primary central nervous system lymphomas: analysis of 83 cases. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-03-1024

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.