Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 398

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phenotype and genotype of a cohort of families historically diagnosed with type 1 von Willebrand disease in the European study, Molecular and Clinical Markers for the Diagnosis and Management of Type 1 von Willebrand Disease (MCMDM-1VWD)

Open access
Goodeve, Anne, Eikenboom, Jeroen, Castaman, Giancarlo, Rodeghiero, Francesco, Federici, Augusto B., Batlle, Javier, Meyer, Dominique, Mazurier, Claudine, Goudemand, Jenny, Schneppenheim, Reinhard, Budde, Ulrich, Ingerslev, Jorgen, Habart, David, Vorlova, Zdena, Holmberg, Lars, Lethagen, Stefan, Pasi, John, Hill, Frank, Soteh, Mohammad Hashemi, Baronciani, Luciano, Hallden, Christer, Guilliatt, Andrea, Lester, Will, Peake, Ian·2007·Blood

Abstract

Type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) is characterized by a personal and family history of bleeding coincident with reduced levels of normal plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF). The molecular basis of the disorder is poorly understood. The aims of this study were to determine phenotype and genotype and their relationship in patients historically diagnosed with type 1 VWD. Families were recruited in 9 European countries based on previous type 1 VWD diagnosis. Bleeding symptoms were recorded, plasma phenotype analyzed, and VWF mutation analysis performed in all index cases (ICs). Phenotypic and molecular analysis stratified patients into those with or without phenotypes suggestive of qualitative VWF defects (abnormal multimers) and with or without mutations. A total of 105 of 150 ICs (70%) had mutations identified. A subgroup with abnormal multimers (38% of ICs, 57 of 150) showed a high prevalence of VWF gene mutations (95% of ICs, 54 of 57), whereas in those with qualitatively normal VWF, fewer mutations were identified (55% of ICs, 51 of 93). About one third of the type 1 VWD cases recruited could be reconsidered as type 2. The remaining group could be considered “true” type 1 VWD, although mutations were found in only 55%.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2006-05-020784

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 398

Metadata

Authors
Goodeve, A., Eikenboom, J., Castaman, G., Rodeghiero, F., Federici, A. B., Batlle, J., Meyer, D., Mazurier, C., Goudemand, J., Schneppenheim, R., Budde, U., Ingerslev, J., Habart, D., Vorlova, Z., Holmberg, L., Lethagen, S., Pasi, J., Hill, F., Soteh, M. H., Baronciani, L., Hallden, C., Guilliatt, A., Lester, W., & Peake, I.
Venue
Blood
Published
2006-09-19
Volume
109
Issue
1
Pages
112-121
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2064668665
Cited by
398
References
10
FWCI
15.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phenotype and genotype of a cohort of families historically diagnosed with type 1 von Willebrand disease in the European study, Molecular and Clinical Markers for the Diagnosis and Management of Type 1 von Willebrand Disease (MCMDM-1VWD). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2006-05-020784
The paper
Goodeve, A., Eikenboom, J., Castaman, G., Rodeghiero, F., Federici, A. B., Batlle, J., Meyer, D., Mazurier, C., Goudemand, J., Schneppenheim, R., Budde, U., Ingerslev, J., Habart, D., Vorlova, Z., Holmberg, L., Lethagen, S., Pasi, J., Hill, F., Soteh, M. H., . . . Peake, I. (2007). Phenotype and genotype of a cohort of families historically diagnosed with type 1 von Willebrand disease in the European study, Molecular and Clinical Markers for the Diagnosis and Management of Type 1 von Willebrand Disease (MCMDM-1VWD). Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-05-020784

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.