Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 381

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gene-expression signature of benign monoclonal gammopathy evident in multiple myeloma is linked to good prognosis

Open access
Zhan, Fenghuang, Barlogie, Bart, Arzoumanian, Varant, Huang, Yongsheng, Williams, David R., Hollmig, Klaus, Pineda-Roman, Mauricio, Tricot, Guido, van Rhee, Frits, Zangari, Maurizio, Dhodapkar, Madhav, Shaughnessy, John D.·2007·Blood

Abstract

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) can progress to multiple myeloma (MM). Although these diseases share many of the same genetic features, it is still unclear whether global gene-expression profiling might identify prior genomic signatures that distinguish them. Through significance analysis of microarrays, 52 genes involved in important pathways related to cancer were differentially expressed in the plasma cells of healthy subjects (normal plasma-cell [NPC]; n = 22) and patients with stringently defined MGUS/smoldering MM (n = 24) and symptomatic MM (n = 351) (P < .001). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of 351 patients with MM, 44 with MGUS (24 + 20), and 16 with MM from MGUS created 2 major cluster branches, one containing 82% of the MGUS patients and the other containing 28% of the MM patients, termed MGUS-like MM (MGUS-L MM). Using the same clustering approach on an independent cohort of 214 patients with MM, 27% were found to be MGUS-L. This molecular signature, despite its association with a lower incidence of complete remission (P = .006), was associated with low-risk clinical and molecular features and superior survival (P < .01). The MGUS-L signature was also seen in plasma cells from 15 of 20 patients surviving more than 10 years after autotransplantation. These data provide insight into the molecular mechanisms of plasma-cell dyscrasias.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2006-07-037077

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 381

Metadata

Authors
Zhan, F., Barlogie, B., Arzoumanian, V., Huang, Y., Williams, D. R., Hollmig, K., Pineda-Roman, M., Tricot, G., van Rhee, F., Zangari, M., Dhodapkar, M., & Shaughnessy, J. D.
Venue
Blood
Published
2006-10-05
Volume
109
Issue
4
Pages
1692-1700
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W1997001746
Cited by
381
References
29
FWCI
10.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gene-expression signature of benign monoclonal gammopathy evident in multiple myeloma is linked to good prognosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2006-07-037077
The paper
Zhan, F., Barlogie, B., Arzoumanian, V., Huang, Y., Williams, D. R., Hollmig, K., Pineda-Roman, M., Tricot, G., van Rhee, F., Zangari, M., Dhodapkar, M., & Shaughnessy, J. D. (2007). Gene-expression signature of benign monoclonal gammopathy evident in multiple myeloma is linked to good prognosis. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-07-037077

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.