Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Outcomes in CCG-2961, a Children's Oncology Group Phase 3 Trial for untreated pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group

Open access
Lange, Beverly J., Smith, Franklin O., Feusner, James, Barnard, Dorothy R., Dinndorf, Patricia, Feig, Stephen, Heerema, Nyla A., Arndt, Carola, Arceci, Robert J., Seibel, Nita, Weiman, Margie, Dusenbery, Kathryn, Shannon, Kevin, Luna-Fineman, Sandra, Gerbing, Robert B., Alonzo, Todd A.·2008·Blood

Abstract

CCG-2961 incorporated 3 new agents, idarubicin, fludarabine and interleukin-2, into a phase 3 AML trial using intensive-timing remission induction/consolidation and related donor marrow transplantation or high-dose cytarabine intensifi-cation. Among 901 patients under age 21 years, 5-year survival was 52%, and event-free survival was 42%. Survival improved from 44% between 1996 and 1998 to 58% between 2000 and 2002 (P = .005), and treatment-related mortality declined from 19% to 12% (P = .025). Partial replacement of daunomycin with idarubicin in the 5-drug induction combination achieved a remission rate of 88%, similar to historical controls. Postremission survival was 56% in patients randomized to either 5-drug reinduction or fludarabine/cytarabine/idarubicin. For patients with or without a related donor, respective 5-year disease-free survival was 61% and 50% (P = .021); respective survival was 68% and 62% (P = .425). Donor availability conferred no benefit on those with inv(16) or t(8;21) cytogenetics. After cytarabine intensification, patients randomized to interleukin-2 or none experienced similar outcomes. Factors predictive of inferior survival were age more than 16 years, non-white ethnicity, absence of related donor, obesity, white blood cell count more than 100 000 × 109/L, −7/7q−, −5/5q−, and/or complex karyotype. No new agent improved outcomes; experience may have contributed to better results time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2007-04-084293

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Cited by

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Lange, B. J., Smith, F. O., Feusner, J., Barnard, D. R., Dinndorf, P., Feig, S., Heerema, N. A., Arndt, C., Arceci, R. J., Seibel, N., Weiman, M., Dusenbery, K., Shannon, K., Luna-Fineman, S., Gerbing, R. B., & Alonzo, T. A.
Venue
Blood
Published
2008-02-01
Volume
111
Issue
3
Pages
1044-1053
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2018591383
Cited by
274
References
42
FWCI
10.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcomes in CCG-2961, a Children's Oncology Group Phase 3 Trial for untreated pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2007-04-084293
The paper
Lange, B. J., Smith, F. O., Feusner, J., Barnard, D. R., Dinndorf, P., Feig, S., Heerema, N. A., Arndt, C., Arceci, R. J., Seibel, N., Weiman, M., Dusenbery, K., Shannon, K., Luna-Fineman, S., Gerbing, R. B., & Alonzo, T. A. (2008). Outcomes in CCG-2961, a Children's Oncology Group Phase 3 Trial for untreated pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-04-084293

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.