Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Myeloablative allogeneic versus autologous stem cell transplantation in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission: a prospective sibling donor versus no-donor comparison

Open access
Cornelissen, Jan J., van der Holt, Bronno, Verhoef, Gregor E. G., van 't Veer, Mars B., van Oers, Marinus H. J., Schouten, Harry C., Ossenkoppele, Gert, Sonneveld, Pieter, Maertens, Johan, van Marwijk Kooy, Marinus, Schaafsma, Martijn R., Wijermans, Pierre W., Biesma, Douwe H., Wittebol, Shulamit, Voogt, Paul J., Baars, Joke W., Zachée, Pierre, Verdonck, Leo F., Löwenberg, Bob, Dekker, Adriaan W.·2009·Blood

Abstract

While commonly accepted in poor-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is still disputed in adult patients with standard-risk ALL. We evaluated outcome of patients with ALL in first complete remission (CR1), according to a sibling donor versus no-donor comparison. Eligible patients (433) were entered in 2 consecutive, prospective studies, of whom 288 (67%) were younger than 55 years, in CR1, and eligible to receive consolidation by either an autologous SCT or an allo-SCT. Allo-SCT was performed in 91 of 96 patients with a compatible sibling donor. Cumulative incidences of relapse at 5 years were, respectively, 24 and 55% for patients with a donor versus those without a donor (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; 0.23-0.60; P < .001). Nonrelapse mortality estimated 16% (± 4) at 5 years after allo-SCT. As a result, disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was significantly better in the donor group: 60 versus 42% in the no-donor group (HR: 0.60; 0.41-0.89; P = .01). After risk-group analysis, improved outcome was more pronounced in standard-risk patients with a donor, who experienced an overall survival of 69% at 5 years (P = .05). In conclusion, standard-risk ALL patients with a sibling donor may show favorable survival following SCT, due to both a strong reduction of relapse and a modest nonrelapse mortality. This trial is registered with http://www.trialregister.nl under trial ID NTR228.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2008-07-168625

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 173

Metadata

Authors
Cornelissen, J. J., van der Holt, B., Verhoef, G. E. G., van 't Veer, M. B., van Oers, M. H. J., Schouten, H. C., Ossenkoppele, G., Sonneveld, P., Maertens, J., van Marwijk Kooy, M., Schaafsma, M. R., Wijermans, P. W., Biesma, D. H., Wittebol, S., Voogt, P. J., Baars, J. W., Zachée, P., Verdonck, L. F., Löwenberg, B., & Dekker, A. W.
Venue
Blood
Published
2009-02-05
Volume
113
Issue
6
Pages
1375-1382
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2105746514
Cited by
173
References
2
FWCI
6.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Myeloablative allogeneic versus autologous stem cell transplantation in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission: a prospective sibling donor versus no-donor comparison. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2008-07-168625
The paper
Cornelissen, J. J., van der Holt, B., Verhoef, G. E. G., van 't Veer, M. B., van Oers, M. H. J., Schouten, H. C., Ossenkoppele, G., Sonneveld, P., Maertens, J., van Marwijk Kooy, M., Schaafsma, M. R., Wijermans, P. W., Biesma, D. H., Wittebol, S., Voogt, P. J., Baars, J. W., Zachée, P., Verdonck, L. F., Löwenberg, B., & Dekker, A. W. (2009). Myeloablative allogeneic versus autologous stem cell transplantation in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission: a prospective sibling donor versus no-donor comparison. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-07-168625

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.