Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 403

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intensive chemotherapy does not benefit most older patients (age 70 years or older) with acute myeloid leukemia

Open access
Kantarjian, Hagop, Ravandi, Farhad, O'Brien, Susan, Cortes, Jorge, Faderl, Stefan, Garcia-Manero, Guillermo, Jabbour, Elias, Wierda, William, Kadia, Tapan, Pierce, Sherry, Shan, Jianqin, Keating, Michael, Freireich, Emil J.·2010·Blood

Abstract

Patients ≥ 70 years of age with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have a poor prognosis. Recent studies suggested that intensive AML-type therapy is tolerated and may benefit most. We analyzed 446 patients ≥ 70 years of age with AML (≥ 20% blasts) treated with cytarabine-based intensive chemotherapy between 1990 and 2008 to identify risk groups for high induction (8-week) mortality. Excluding patients with favorable karyotypes, the overall complete response rate was 45%, 4-week mortality was 26%, and 8-week mortality was 36%. The median survival was 4.6 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 28%. Survival was similar among patients treated before 2000 and since 2000. A multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for 8-week mortality identified the following to be independently adverse: age ≥ 80 years, complex karyotypes, (≥ 3 abnormalities), poor performance (2-4 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group), and elevated creatinine > 1.3 mg/dL. Patients with none (28%), 1 (40%), 2 (23%), or ≥ 3 factors (9%) had estimated 8-week mortality rates of 16%, 31%, 55%, and 71% respectively. The 8-week mortality model also predicted for differences in complete response and survival rates. In summary, the prognosis of most patients (72%) ≥ 70 years of age with AML is poor with intensive chemotherapy (8-week mortality ≥ 30%; median survival < 6 months).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2010-03-276485

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 403

Metadata

Authors
Kantarjian, H., Ravandi, F., O'Brien, S., Cortes, J., Faderl, S., Garcia-Manero, G., Jabbour, E., Wierda, W., Kadia, T., Pierce, S., Shan, J., Keating, M., & Freireich, E. J.
Venue
Blood
Published
2010-11-25
Volume
116
Issue
22
Pages
4422-4429
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2051987542
Cited by
403
References
44
FWCI
14.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intensive chemotherapy does not benefit most older patients (age 70 years or older) with acute myeloid leukemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2010-03-276485
The paper
Kantarjian, H., Ravandi, F., O'Brien, S., Cortes, J., Faderl, S., Garcia-Manero, G., Jabbour, E., Wierda, W., Kadia, T., Pierce, S., Shan, J., Keating, M., & Freireich, E. J. (2010). Intensive chemotherapy does not benefit most older patients (age 70 years or older) with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-03-276485

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.