The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematologic malignancy: relative risks and benefits of double umbilical cord blood
Open accessAbstract
Effectiveness of double umbilical cord blood (dUCB) grafts relative to conventional marrow and mobilized peripheral blood from related and unrelated donors has yet to be established. We studied 536 patients at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Minnesota with malignant disease who underwent transplantation with an human leukocyte antigen (HLA)–matched related donor (MRD, n = 204), HLA allele–matched unrelated donor (MUD, n = 152) or 1-antigen–mismatched unrelated adult donor (MMUD, n = 52) or 4-6/6 HLA matched dUCB (n = 128) graft after myeloablative conditioning. Leukemia-free survival at 5 years was similar for each donor type (dUCB 51% [95% confidence interval (CI), 41%-59%]; MRD 33% [95% CI, 26%-41%]; MUD 48% [40%-56%]; MMUD 38% [95% CI, 25%-51%]). The risk of relapse was lower in recipients of dUCB (15%, 95% CI, 9%-22%) compared with MRD (43%, 95% CI, 35%-52%), MUD (37%, 95% CI, 29%-46%) and MMUD (35%, 95% CI, 21%-48%), yet nonrelapse mortality was higher for dUCB (34%, 95% CI, 25%-42%), MRD (24% (95% CI, 17%-39%), and MUD (14%, 95% CI, 9%-20%). We conclude that leukemia-free survival after dUCB transplantation is comparable with that observed after MRD and MUD transplantation. For patients without an available HLA matched donor, the use of 2 partially HLA-matched UCB units is a suitable alternative.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk
Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144 · Cited by 14,290
Cited by
Döhner, H., Weisdorf, D. J., & Bloomfield, C. D. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1406184 · Cited by 3,306
Self-citationUmbilical cord blood transplantation: the first 25 years and beyond
Ballen, K. K., Gluckman, E., & Broxmeyer, H. E. (2013) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2013-02-453175 · Cited by 709
Foley, B., Cooley, S., Verneris, M. R., Pitt, M., Curtsinger, J., Luo, X., Lopez-Vergès, S., Lanier, L. L., Weisdorf, D., & Miller, J. S. (2012) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2011-10-386995 · Cited by 630
Self-citationPyrimidoindole derivatives are agonists of human hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal
Fares, I., Chagraoui, J., Gareau, Y., Gingras, S., Ruel, R., Mayotte, N., Csaszar, E., Knapp, D. J. H. F., Miller, P., Ngom, M., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1256337 · Cited by 565
Frenette, P. S., Pinho, S., Lucas, D., & Scheiermann, C. (2013) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-095919 · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Authors
- Brunstein, C. G., Gutman, J. A., Weisdorf, D. J., Woolfrey, A. E., DeFor, T. E., Gooley, T. A., Verneris, M. R., Appelbaum, F. R., Wagner, J. E., & Delaney, C.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2010-11-25
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 4693-4699
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W2028795322
- Cited by
- 487
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematologic malignancy: relative risks and benefits of double umbilical cord blood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2010-05-285304
- The paper
- Brunstein, C. G., Gutman, J. A., Weisdorf, D. J., Woolfrey, A. E., DeFor, T. E., Gooley, T. A., Verneris, M. R., Appelbaum, F. R., Wagner, J. E., & Delaney, C. (2010). Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematologic malignancy: relative risks and benefits of double umbilical cord blood. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-05-285304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.