The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The 2008 WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms and beyond: evolving concepts and practical applications
Open accessAbstract
The World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms updated in 2008 represents a worldwide consensus on the diagnosis of these tumors and is based on the recognition of distinct diseases, using a multidisciplinary approach. The updated classification refined the definitions of well-recognized diseases, identified new entities and variants, and incorporated emerging concepts in the understanding of lymphoid neoplasms. However, some questions were unresolved, such as the extent to which specific genetic or molecular alterations define certain tumors, and the status of provisional entities, categories for which the World Health Organization working groups felt there was insufficient evidence to recognize as distinct diseases at this time. In addition, since its publication, new findings and ideas have been generated. This review summarizes the scientific rationale for the classification, emphasizing changes that have had an effect on practice guidelines. The authors address the criteria and significance of early or precursor lesions and the identification of certain lymphoid neoplasms largely associated with particular age groups, such as children and the elderly. The issue of borderline categories having overlapping features with large B-cell lymphomas, as well as several provisional entities, is reviewed. These new observations chart a course for future research in the field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
International network of cancer genome projects
The International Cancer Genome Consortium (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08987 · Cited by 2,299
Cited by
The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms
Swerdlow, S. H., Campo, E., Pileri, S. A., Harris, N. L., Stein, H., Siebert, R., Advani, R., Ghielmini, M., Salles, G. A., Zelenetz, A. D., et al. (2016) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2016-01-643569 · Cited by 7,831
Self-citationArber, D. A., Orazi, A., Hasserjian, R. P., Borowitz, M. J., Calvo, K. R., Kvasnicka, H.-M., Wang, S. A., Bagg, A., Barbui, T., Branford, S., et al. (2022) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.2022015850 · Cited by 2,945
Targeting pathological B cell receptor signalling in lymphoid malignancies
Young, R. M., & Staudt, L. M. (2013) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3937 · Cited by 401
Horwitz, S. M., Koch, R., Porcu, P., Oki, Y., Moskowitz, A., Perez, M., Myskowski, P., Officer, A., Jaffe, J. D., Morrow, S. N., et al. (2018) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2017-08-802470 · Cited by 290
Germinal center‐derived lymphomas: The darkest side of humoral immunity
Mlynarczyk, C., Fontán, L., & Melnick, A. (2019) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12755 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Campo, E., Swerdlow, S. H., Harris, N. L., Pileri, S., Stein, H., & Jaffe, E. S.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2011-05-12
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 5019-5032
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W2045399297
- Cited by
- 2,008
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 75.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The 2008 WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms and beyond: evolving concepts and practical applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2011-01-293050
- The paper
- Campo, E., Swerdlow, S. H., Harris, N. L., Pileri, S., Stein, H., & Jaffe, E. S. (2011). The 2008 WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms and beyond: evolving concepts and practical applications. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-01-293050
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.