Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A novel hierarchical prognostic model of AML solely based on molecular mutations

Grossmann, Vera, Schnittger, Susanne, Kohlmann, Alexander, Eder, Christiane, Roller, Andreas, Dicker, Frank, Schmid, Christoph, Wendtner, Clemens-Martin, Staib, Peter, Serve, Hubert, Kreuzer, Karl-Anton, Kern, Wolfgang, Haferlach, Torsten, Haferlach, Claudia·2012·Blood

Abstract

The karyotype is so far the most important prognostic parameter in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Molecular mutations have been analyzed to subdivide AML with normal karyotype into prognostic subsets. The aim of this study was to develop a prognostic model for the entire AML cohort solely based on molecular markers. One thousand patients with cytogenetic data were investigated for the following molecular alterations: PML-RARA, RUNX1-RUNX1T1, CBFB-MYH11, FLT3-ITD, and MLL-PTD, as well as mutations in NPM1, CEPBA, RUNX1, ASXL1, and TP53. Clinical data were available in 841 patients. Based on Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses, 5 distinct prognostic subgroups were identified: (1) very favorable: PML-RARA rearrangement (n = 29) or CEPBA double mutations (n = 42; overall survival [OS] at 3 years: 82.9%); (2) favorable: RUNX1-RUNX1T1 (n = 35), CBFB-MYH11 (n = 31), or NPM1 mutation without FLT3-ITD (n = 186; OS at 3 years: 62.6%); (3) intermediate: none of the mutations leading to assignment into groups 1, 2, 4, or 5 (n = 235; OS at 3 years: 44.2%); (4) unfavorable: MLL-PTD and/or RUNX1 mutation and/or ASXL1 mutation (n = 203; OS at 3 years: 21.9%); and (5) very unfavorable: TP53 mutation (n = 80; OS at 3 years: 0%; P < .001). This comprehensive molecular characterization provides a more powerful model for prognostication than cytogenetics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2012-03-419622

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
Grossmann, V., Schnittger, S., Kohlmann, A., Eder, C., Roller, A., Dicker, F., Schmid, C., Wendtner, C.-M., Staib, P., Serve, H., Kreuzer, K.-A., Kern, W., Haferlach, T., & Haferlach, C.
Venue
Blood
Published
2012-10-11
Volume
120
Issue
15
Pages
2963-2972
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W1986993506
Cited by
252
References
6
FWCI
20.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A novel hierarchical prognostic model of AML solely based on molecular mutations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2012-03-419622
The paper
Grossmann, V., Schnittger, S., Kohlmann, A., Eder, C., Roller, A., Dicker, F., Schmid, C., Wendtner, C.-M., Staib, P., Serve, H., Kreuzer, K.-A., Kern, W., Haferlach, T., & Haferlach, C. (2012). A novel hierarchical prognostic model of AML solely based on molecular mutations. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-03-419622

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.