Cited by 192Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment

Clinical, genomic, and imaging predictors of myeloma progression from asymptomatic monoclonal gammopathies (SWOG S0120)

Open access
Dhodapkar, Madhav V., Sexton, Rachael, Waheed, Sarah, Usmani, Saad, Papanikolaou, Xenofon, Nair, Bijay, Petty, Nathan, Shaughnessy, John D. +4 more·2014·Blood

Abstract

Key Points: First prospective US cooperative trial group in preneoplastic gammopathies. Prospective demonstration that genomic features of preneoplastic cells predict disease risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2013-07-515239

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MGUS/SMM may have distinct gene expression signatures capable of predicting progression to MM.

    “From the transcriptomic point of view, it has been shown that MGUS/SMM may have distinct gene expression signatures capable of predicting progression to MM.89,90”

    From Evolution of Multiple Myeloma from a Genomic Perspective (2026) · cites this paper as [89]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says the GEP-70 gene-expression score independently predicted progression from asymptomatic multiple myeloma (SMM) to clinical myeloma. It also says most predictive utility was in SMM and that further study is needed to establish its utility in MGUS, so prediction for MGUS is not established by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [8]Alexanian R. Localized and indolent myeloma. Blood. 1980;56(3):521–525. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [20]Cox DR. Regression and life tables. Stat Soc. 1972;34:187–202. [Google Scholar]
  3. [22]LeBlanc M, Crowley J. Survival by goodness of split. J Am Stat Assoc. 1993;88:457–467. [Google Scholar]
  4. [23]Xu R, O'Quigley JA. R2 type measure of dependence for proportional hazards models. J Nonparametr Statist. 1999;12:83–107. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dhodapkar, M. V., Sexton, R., Waheed, S., Usmani, S., Papanikolaou, X., Nair, B., Petty, N., Shaughnessy, J. D., Hoering, A., Crowley, J., Orlowski, R. Z., & Barlogie, B.
Affiliations
  • Yale Cancer Center (US)
  • Cancer Research And Biostatistics (US)
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Venue
Blood
Published
2014-01-02
Volume
123
Issue
1
Pages
78-85
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W1968121313
Cited by
192
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 28
FWCI
14.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Blood (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Institutes of Health (2u10ca038926-25)
  • National Cancer Institute (U10CA004919, R01CA135110, CA-11083, CA 68183, N01 CA035176, CA-76462, CA-46282, CA37981, CA 20319, N01 CA027057, N01 CA038926, CA58416, U10CA068183, U10CA058882, N01 CA004919, N01 CA032102, U10-CA038926, CA-12644, U10CA027057, U10CA020319, U10CA011083, CA-58882, P01CA055819, U10CA035119, U10CA032102, U10CA046282, U10CA012644, R01CA106802, U10CA058416, N01 CA046441, U10CA035176, CA-76447, U10CA037981, N01 CA035119, U10CA076447, P30CA016672, U10CA046441)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
multiple myeloma, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, asymptomatic multiple myeloma, disease progression, gene expression profiles, free light chains, M-spike, focal lesions, magnetic resonance imaging, molecular subtypes, risk prediction
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin Light Chains, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance, Multiple Myeloma, Precancerous Conditions, Prospective Studies, Risk, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Proportional Hazards Models, Disease Progression, Syndecan-1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review