The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
2021 Update on MRD in acute myeloid leukemia: a consensus document from the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party
Open accessAbstract
Measurable residual disease (MRD) is an important biomarker in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that is used for prognostic, predictive, monitoring, and efficacy-response assessments. The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) MRD Working Party evaluated standardization and harmonization of MRD in an ongoing manner and has updated the 2018 ELN MRD recommendations based on significant developments in the field. New and revised recommendations were established during in-person and online meetings, and a 2-stage Delphi poll was conducted to optimize consensus. All recommendations are graded by levels of evidence and agreement. Major changes include technical specifications for next-generation sequencing-based MRD testing and integrative assessments of MRD irrespective of technology. Other topics include use of MRD as a prognostic and surrogate end point for drug testing; selection of the technique, material, and appropriate time points for MRD assessment; and clinical implications of MRD assessment. In addition to technical recommendations for flow- and molecular-MRD analysis, we provide MRD thresholds and define MRD response, and detail how MRD results should be reported and combined if several techniques are used. MRD assessment in AML is complex and clinically relevant, and standardized approaches to application, interpretation, technical conduct, and reporting are of critical importance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clonal Hematopoiesis and Evolution to Hematopoietic Malignancies
Bowman, R. L., Busque, L., & Levine, R. L. (2018) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2018.01.011 · Cited by 448
Age-related clonal hematopoiesis
Shlush, L. I. (2018) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2017-07-746453 · Cited by 281
Cited by
Measurable Residual Disease in High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Cluzeau, T., Lemoli, R. M., McCloskey, J., & Cooper, T. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14051278 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Heuser, M., Freeman, S. D., Ossenkoppele, G. J., Buccisano, F., Hourigan, C. S., Ngai, L. L., Tettero, J. M., Bachas, C., Baer, C., Béné, M.-C., Bücklein, V., Czyz, A., Denys, B., Dillon, R., Feuring-Buske, M., Guzman, M. L., Haferlach, T., Han, L., Herzig, J. K., Jorgensen, J. L., Kern, W., Konopleva, M. Y., Lacombe, F., Libura, M., Majchrzak, A., Maurillo, L., Ofran, Y., Philippe, J., Plesa, A., Preudhomme, C., Ravandi, F., Roumier, C., Subklewe, M., Thol, F., van de Loosdrecht, A. A., van der Reijden, B. A., Venditti, A., Wierzbowska, A., Valk, P. J. M., Wood, B. L., Walter, R. B., Thiede, C., Döhner, K., Roboz, G. J., & Cloos, J.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2021-12-30
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 2753-2767
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W3209416216
- Cited by
- 763
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 64.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 2021 Update on MRD in acute myeloid leukemia: a consensus document from the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.2021013626
- The paper
- Heuser, M., Freeman, S. D., Ossenkoppele, G. J., Buccisano, F., Hourigan, C. S., Ngai, L. L., Tettero, J. M., Bachas, C., Baer, C., Béné, M.-C., Bücklein, V., Czyz, A., Denys, B., Dillon, R., Feuring-Buske, M., Guzman, M. L., Haferlach, T., Han, L., Herzig, J. K., . . . Cloos, J. (2021). 2021 Update on MRD in acute myeloid leukemia: a consensus document from the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2021013626
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.