Cited by 41Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchCAR-T cell therapy researchChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genomic determinants of response and resistance to inotuzumab ozogamicin in B-cell ALL

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is an antibody-drug conjugate that delivers calicheamicin to CD22-expressing cells. In a retrospective cohort of InO-treated patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, we sought to understand the genomic determinants of the response and resistance to InO. Pre- and post-InO–treated patient samples were analyzed by whole genome, exome, and/or transcriptome sequencing. Acquired CD22 mutations were observed in 11% (3/27) of post-InO-relapsed tumor samples, but not in refractory samples (0/16). There were multiple CD22 mutations per sample and the mechanisms of CD22 escape included epitope loss (protein truncation and destabilization) and epitope alteration. Two CD22 mutant cases were post-InO hyper-mutators resulting from error-prone DNA damage repair (nonhomologous/alternative end-joining repair, or mismatch repair deficiency), suggesting that hypermutation drove escape from CD22-directed therapy. CD22-mutant relapses occurred after InO and subsequent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), suggesting that InO eliminated the predominant clones, leaving subclones with acquired CD22 mutations that conferred resistance to InO and subsequently expanded. Acquired loss-of-function mutations in TP53, ATM, and CDKN2A were observed, consistent with a compromise of the G1/S DNA damage checkpoint as a mechanism for evading InO-induced apoptosis. Genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screening of cell lines identified DNTT (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase) loss as a marker of InO resistance. In conclusion, genetic alterations modulating CD22 expression and DNA damage response influence InO efficacy. Our findings highlight the importance of defining the basis of CD22 escape and eradication of residual disease before HSCT. The identified mechanisms of escape from CD22-targeted therapy extend beyond antigen loss and provide opportunities to improve therapeutic approaches and overcome resistance. These trials were registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01134575, NCT01371630, and NCT03441061.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood.2024023930

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Shor, 2015, Preclinical and clinical development of inotuzumab-ozogamicin in hematological malignancies, Mol Immunol, 67, 107, 10.1016/j.molimm.2014.09.014 · DOI
  2. Dörken, 1986, HD39 (B3), a B lineage-restricted antigen whose cell surface expression is limited to resting and activated human B lymphocytes, J Immunol, 136, 4470, 10.4049/jimmunol.136.12.4470 · DOI
  3. Zein, 1988, Calicheamicin gamma 1I: an antitumor antibiotic that cleaves double-stranded DNA site specifically, Science, 240, 1198, 10.1126/science.3240341 · DOI
  4. Kantarjian, 2016, Inotuzumab ozogamicin versus standard therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, N Engl J Med, 375, 740, 10.1056/NEJMoa1509277 · DOI
  5. Wynne, 2019, Inotuzumab: from preclinical development to success in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Blood Adv, 3, 96, 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018026211 · DOI
  6. Jabbour, 2024, Phase II study of inotuzumab ozogamicin for measurable residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia in remission, Blood, 143, 417, 10.1182/blood.2023022330 · DOI
  7. Sotillo, 2015, Convergence of acquired mutations and alternative splicing of CD19 enables resistance to CART-19 immunotherapy, Cancer Discov, 5, 1282, 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-1020 · DOI
  8. Orlando, 2018, Genetic mechanisms of target antigen loss in CAR19 therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Nat Med, 24, 1504, 10.1038/s41591-018-0146-z · DOI
  9. Zhao, 2021, Tumor-intrinsic and -extrinsic determinants of response to blinatumomab in adults with B-ALL, Blood, 137, 471, 10.1182/blood.2020006287 · DOI
  10. O'Brien, 2022, Phase II trial of inotuzumab ozogamicin in children and adolescents with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: children's oncology group protocol AALL1621, J Clin Oncol, 40, 956, 10.1200/JCO.21.01693 · DOI
  11. Zheng, 2022, Modulation of CD22 protein expression in childhood leukemia by pervasive splicing aberrations: implications for CD22-directed immunotherapies, Blood Cancer Discov, 3, 103, 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-21-0087 · DOI
  12. Pennesi, 2022, Inotuzumab ozogamicin as single agent in pediatric patients with relapsed and refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from a phase II trial, Leukemia, 36, 1516, 10.1038/s41375-022-01576-3 · DOI
  13. Chang, 2017, Non-homologous DNA end joining and alternative pathways to double-strand break repair, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 18, 495, 10.1038/nrm.2017.48 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Dahm, 2007, Functions and regulation of human artemis in double strand break repair, J Cell Biochem, 100, 1346, 10.1002/jcb.21226 · DOI
  15. Smith, 2010, The ATM-Chk2 and ATR-Chk1 pathways in DNA damage signaling and cancer, Adv Cancer Res, 108, 73, 10.1016/B978-0-12-380888-2.00003-0 · DOI
  16. Tirrò, 2019, Chk1 inhibition restores inotuzumab ozogamicin citotoxicity in CD22-positive cells expressing mutant p53, Front Oncol, 9, 57, 10.3389/fonc.2019.00057 · DOI
  17. Dobin, 2013, STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner, Bioinformatics, 29, 15, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Li, 2009, Fast and accurate short read alignment with burrows-wheeler transform, Bioinformatics, 25, 1754, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Cibulskis, 2013, Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples, Nat Biotechnol, 31, 213, 10.1038/nbt.2514 · DOI
  20. Wang, 2010, ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data, Nucleic Acids Res, 38, e164, 10.1093/nar/gkq603 · DOI
  21. Zhou, 2016, Exploring genomic alteration in pediatric cancer using protein paint, Nat Genet, 48, 4, 10.1038/ng.3466 · DOI
  22. Miller, 2016, Visualizing tumor evolution with the fish plot package for R, BMC Genomics, 17, 880, 10.1186/s12864-016-3195-z · DOI
  23. Jabbour, 2019, Inotuzumab ozogamicin in combination with low-intensity chemotherapy (mini-HCVD) with or without blinatumomab versus standard intensive chemotherapy (HCVAD) as frontline therapy for older patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a propensity score analysis, Cancer, 125, 2579, 10.1002/cncr.32139 · DOI
  24. Paietta, 2021, Molecular classification improves risk assessment in adult BCR-ABL1-negative B-ALL, Blood, 138, 948, 10.1182/blood.2020010144 · DOI
  25. Haddox, 2017, Blinatumomab-induced lineage switch of B-ALL with t(4:11)(q21;q23) KMT2A/AFF1 into an aggressive AML: pre- and post-switch phenotypic, cytogenetic and molecular analysis, Blood Cancer J, 7, e607, 10.1038/bcj.2017.89 · DOI
  26. Wolfl, 2018, Spontaneous reversion of a lineage switch following an initial blinatumomab-induced ALL-to-AML switch in MLL-rearranged infant ALL, Blood Adv, 2, 1382, 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018018093 · DOI
  27. Zoghbi, 2017, Lineage switch under blinatumomab treatment of relapsed common acute lymphoblastic leukemia without MLL rearrangement, Pediatr Blood Cancer, 64, 10.1002/pbc.26594 · DOI
  28. Ereño-Orbea, 2017, Molecular basis of human CD22 function and therapeutic targeting, Nat Commun, 8, 764, 10.1038/s41467-017-00836-6 · DOI
  29. Zhao, 2020, The molecular basis and disease relevance of non-homologous DNA end joining, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 21, 765, 10.1038/s41580-020-00297-8 · DOI
  30. Mitui, 2009, Functional and computational assessment of missense variants in the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene: mutations with increased cancer risk, Hum Mutat, 30, 12, 10.1002/humu.20805 · DOI
  31. Bucher, 2008, G2 checkpoint abrogation and checkpoint kinase-1 targeting in the treatment of cancer, Br J Cancer, 98, 523, 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604208 · DOI
  32. Ray Chaudhuri, 2016, Replication fork stability confers chemoresistance in BRCA-deficient cells, Nature, 535, 382, 10.1038/nature18325 · DOI
  33. Motea, 2010, Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase: the story of a misguided DNA polymerase, Biochim Biophys Acta, 1804, 1151, 10.1016/j.bbapap.2009.06.030 · DOI
  34. Zhang, 2023, Deep sampling of gRNA in the human genome and deep-learning-informed prediction of gRNA activities, Cell Discov, 9, 48, 10.1038/s41421-023-00549-9 · DOI
  35. Xiao, 2023, Absence of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase expression in T-ALL/LBL accumulates chromosomal abnormalities to induce drug resistance, Int J Cancer, 152, 2383, 10.1002/ijc.34465 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, Y., Short, N. J., Kantarjian, H. M., Chang, T.-C., Ghate, P. S., Qu, C., Macaron, W., Jain, N., Thakral, B., Phillips, A. H., Khoury, J., Garcia-Manero, G., Zhang, W., Fan, Y., Yang, H., Garris, R. S., Nasr, L. F., Kriwacki, R. W., Roberts, K. G., Konopleva, M., Jabbour, E. J., & Mullighan, C. G.
Affiliations
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • 3Department of Leukemia, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Mullighan, Charles G.
Venue
Blood
Published
2024-07-04
Volume
144
Issue
1
Pages
61-73
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W4393307256
Cited by
41
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 6
FWCI
16.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Blood (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (CA021765, P30 CA021765)
  • American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (CA021765)
  • National Institutes of Health (CA 021765)
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • National Cancer Institute (CA021765, CA197695, R35CA197695, P30CA021765)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Keywords
inotuzumab ozogamicin, B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acquired drug resistance, epitope loss, DNA repair, hypermutation, TP53, ATM, CDKN2A, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, CRISPR-Cas9 screen, calicheamicin, antibody-drug conjugates, G1/S checkpoint, residual disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review