The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Basophil counting with a new staining method using alcian blue
Abstract
Difficulties in obtaining reproducible and accurate enumeration of circulating basophils with existing techniques have hampered investigation of this infrequent cell population. A new basophil staining method is described that employs alcian blue dye for staining of heparin within basophils at low pH and in the presence of lanthanum ions. Basophil recognition is facilitated by reducing nonspecific nuclear staining. This objective is achieved because of the differences in stability of alcian blue-heparin, alcian blue-nucleic acid, lanthanum-heparin, and lanthanum-mucliec acid complexes. Reduction of pH after staining also favors solubilization of leukocyte cytoplasmic proteins, providing greater contrast between stained and unstained cells by reducing light scattering of the unstained leukocytes . The alcian blue staining method is suitable both for chamber basophil counting and automated basophil counting using continuous-flow sampling and electro-optical detection. The new staining method was evaluated by comparing it with the chamber counting method using toluidine blue in a triple-blind study in which the results of basophil counting by the alcian blue chamber method, alcian blue automated instrument method, and the toluidine blue chamber method were analyzed for reproducibility and compared with an indirect basophil count obtained from a 1000-cell leukocyte differential and a total leukocyte count. Both alcian blue staining methods gave greater reporducibility that toluidine blue and were more accurate, as evidinced by a significantly higher correlation with the indirect basophil count. The improved reproducibility, accuracy, and convenience of this method over existing methods should facilitate the collection of more meaningful information about circulating basophil levels in health and disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Galli, S. J. (1990) · Pathology Reviews • 1990 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0485-5_5 · Cited by 615
Monitoring human basophil activation via CD63 monoclonal antibody 435
Knol, E. F., Mul, F. P. J., Jansen, H., Calafat, J., & Roos, D. (1991) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/0091-6749(91)90094-5 · Cited by 421
Activation of basophil and mast cell histamine release by eosinophil granule major basic protein.
O'Donnell, M. C., Ackerman, S. J., Gleich, G. J., & Thomas, L. L. (1983) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.157.6.1981 · Cited by 321
Bone resorption activity of particulate-stimulated macrophages
Glant, T. T., Jacobs, J. J., Molnár, G., Shanbhag, A. S., Valyon, M., & Galante, J. O. (1993) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650080907 · Cited by 309
Basophil influx occurs after nasal antigen challenge: Effects of topical corticosteroid pretreatment
Bascom, R., Wachs, M., Naclerio, R. M., Pipkorn, U., Galli, S. J., & Lichtenstein, L. M. (1988) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/0091-6749(88)90198-4 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilbert, H., & Ornstein, L.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 1975-08-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 279-286
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W1595101033
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Basophil counting with a new staining method using alcian blue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.v46.2.279.279
- The paper
- Gilbert, H., & Ornstein, L. (1975). Basophil counting with a new staining method using alcian blue. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v46.2.279.279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.