The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Accurate and independent measurement of volume and hemoglobin concentration of individual red cells by laser light scattering
Open accessAbstract
Cell volume (MCV) and hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) are the red cell indices used to characterize the blood of patients with anemia. Since the introduction of flow cytometric methods for the measurement of these indices, it has generally been assumed that the values derived by these instruments are accurate. However, it has recently been shown that a number of cellular factors, including alterations in cellular deformability, can lead to inaccurate measurement of cell volume by these automated instruments. Because cell hemoglobin concentration and hematocrit are computed from the measured values of cell volume, accuracy of these indices is also compromised by inaccurate determination of cell volume. A recently developed experimental flow cytometric method based on laser light scattering, which can independently measure volume and hemoglobin concentration, has been used in the present study to measure MCV and MCHC of density- fractionated normal and sickle red cells, hydrated and dehydrated normal red cells, and various pathologic cells. We found that the new method accurately measures both volume and hemoglobin concentrations over a wide range of MCV (30 to 120 fL) and MCHC (27 to 45 g/dL) values. This is in contrast to currently available methods in which hemoglobin concentration values are accurately measured over a more limited range (27 to 35 g/dL). In addition, as the experimental method independently measures volume and hemoglobin concentration of individual red cells, it allowed us to generate histograms of volume and hemoglobin concentration distribution and derive coefficient of variation for volume distribution and standard deviation of hemoglobin concentration distribution. We have been able to document that volume and hemoglobin concentration distributions can vary independently of each other in pathologic red cell samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hydroxyurea: effects on hemoglobin F production in patients with sickle cell anemia [see comments]
Charache, S., Dover, G., Moore, R., Eckert, S., Ballas, S., Koshy, M., Milner, P., Orringer, E., Phillips, G. J., & Platt, O. (1992) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v79.10.2555.2555 · Cited by 438
Erythrocyte vesiculation: a self‐protective mechanism?
Willekens, F. L. A., Werre, J. M., Groenen‐Döpp, Y. A. M., Roerdinkholder‐Stoelwinder, B., De Pauw, B., & Bosman, G. J. C. G. M. (2008) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07055.x · Cited by 271
Diagnosis of iron-deficient states
Archer, N. M., & Brugnara, C. (2015) · Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences · doi:10.3109/10408363.2015.1038744 · Cited by 82
Henry, E. R., Cellmer, T., Dunkelberger, E. B., Metaferia, B., Hofrichter, J., Li, Q., Ostrowski, D., Ghirlando, R., Louis, J. M., Moutereau, S., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1922004117 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohandas, N., Kim, Y., Tycko, D., Orlik, J., Wyatt, J., & Groner, W.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 1986-08-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 506-513
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W6223393
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accurate and independent measurement of volume and hemoglobin concentration of individual red cells by laser light scattering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.v68.2.506.506
- The paper
- Mohandas, N., Kim, Y., Tycko, D., Orlik, J., Wyatt, J., & Groner, W. (1986). Accurate and independent measurement of volume and hemoglobin concentration of individual red cells by laser light scattering. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v68.2.506.506
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.