Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 219

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transplantation of umbilical cord blood after myeloablative therapy: analysis of engraftment [see comments]

Open access
Wagner, JE, Broxmeyer, HE, Byrd, RL, Zehnbauer, B, Schmeckpeper, B, Shah, N, Griffin, C, Emanuel, PD, Zuckerman, KS, Cooper, S·1992·Blood

Abstract

The possibility that umbilical cord and placental blood from an HLA- identical sibling might produce stable donor-derived lymphohematopoietic engraftment was tested in a patient with juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia (JCML). After conditioning with high-dose busulfan and cyclophosphamide, cryopreserved umbilical cord blood, containing 0.5 x 10(8) nucleated cells/kg and 2.7 x 10(4) colony forming units-granulocyte, macrophage (CFU-GM)/kg, was infused. A leukocyte count greater than 1,000/microL, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than 500/microL, and platelet count greater than 20,000/microL (untransfused) were observed on days 39, 39, and 47 after transplantation, respectively. Donor cell engraftment was documented in the peripheral blood and bone marrow by cytogenetic analysis, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as early as day 21. Furthermore, the donor origin of each lymphohematopoietic lineage (ie, CD5+ T cells, CD19/20+ B cells, CFU-GM, and burst-forming unit-erythrocyte [BFU-E]) was confirmed. On day 200, assays of the peripheral blood and bone marrow showed an abnormal proliferation of CFU-GM at low seeding densities in the absence of exogenous growth factors, as well as a hypersensitivity to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), both pathophysiologic characteristics of JCML. Recurrent disease was confirmed histologically on day 225. Together, these results demonstrate that umbilical cord blood contains sufficient numbers of hematopoietic stem cells necessary for the engraftment of leukemia patients treated with myeloablative therapy and that the detection of “spontaneous” CFU-GM and hypersensitivity to GM-CSF after treatment is a marker of residual or recurrent disease in patients with JCML.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood.v79.7.1874.1874

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 219

Metadata

Authors
Wagner, J., Broxmeyer, H., Byrd, R., Zehnbauer, B., Schmeckpeper, B., Shah, N., Griffin, C., Emanuel, P., Zuckerman, K., & Cooper, S.
Venue
Blood
Published
1992-04-01
Volume
79
Issue
7
Pages
1874-1881
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2443124492
Cited by
219
References
1
FWCI
14.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transplantation of umbilical cord blood after myeloablative therapy: analysis of engraftment [see comments]. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.v79.7.1874.1874
The paper
Wagner, J., Broxmeyer, H., Byrd, R., Zehnbauer, B., Schmeckpeper, B., Shah, N., Griffin, C., Emanuel, P., Zuckerman, K., & Cooper, S. (1992). Transplantation of umbilical cord blood after myeloablative therapy: analysis of engraftment [see comments]. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v79.7.1874.1874

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.