The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differential cytokine expression in human blood monocyte subpopulations: a polymerase chain reaction analysis
Abstract
The subpopulation of strongly CD14-positive (CD14++) monocytes and monocytes coexpressing the CD16 antigen and low levels of CD14 (CD14+/CD16+ cells) were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) followed by stimulation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) at 1 micrograms/mL. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) after reverse transcription of isolated mRNA (RT-PCR) revealed similar levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) transcripts in both subpopulations. By contrast, transcripts for interleukin-10 (IL-10) were only detectable in CD14++ monocytes, whereas CD14+/CD16+ cells produced no detectable IL-10 transcripts after 4 hours. Only after 16 hours of LPS stimulation was a low level of IL-10 transcripts discernible in CD14+/CD16+ monocytes. The same pattern was seen at the protein level in that TNF in LPS-stimulated supernatants was comparable for both subpopulations, whereas IL-10 was detected in CD14++ monocytes but not in CD14+/CD16+ cells. To avoid interference of cell activation by CD14 and CD16 antibodies, cells were also isolated based on the high and low level of CD33 antigen expression. Again, weakly CD33-positive cells, which comprise the CD14+/CD16+ cells, showed no or only minimal IL-10 mRNA. When comparing blood monocyte subpopulations with alveolar macrophages (AM), AM showed high levels of LPS-stimulated TNF, whereas IL-10 transcripts were undetectable. Our data show that CD14+/CD16+ blood monocytes produce high levels of proinflammatory cytokines like TNF, whereas the anti-inflammatory IL-10 is low or absent, a pattern similar to what is seen in AM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Phagocyte partnership during the onset and resolution of inflammation
Soehnlein, O., & Lindbom, L. (2010) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2779 · Cited by 1,054
The CD14+ CD16+ blood monocytes: their role in infection and inflammation
Ziegler-Heitbrock, L. (2007) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1189/jlb.0806510 · Cited by 1,041
Said, E. A., Dupuy, F. P., Trautmann, L., Zhang, Y., Shi, Y., El-Far, M., Hill, B. J., Noto, A., Ancuta, P., Peretz, Y., et al. (2010) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2106 · Cited by 481
Mukherjee, R., Kanti Barman, P., Kumar Thatoi, P., Tripathy, R., Kumar Das, B., & Ravindran, B. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep13886 · Cited by 431
Timmerman, K. L., Flynn, M. G., Coen, P. M., Markofski, M. M., & Pence, B. D. (2008) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1189/jlb.0408244 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Frankenberger, M., Sternsdorf, T., Pechumer, H., Pforte, A., & Ziegler-Heitbrock, H.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 373-377
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W92308566
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential cytokine expression in human blood monocyte subpopulations: a polymerase chain reaction analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.v87.1.373.373
- The paper
- Frankenberger, M., Sternsdorf, T., Pechumer, H., Pforte, A., & Ziegler-Heitbrock, H. (1996). Differential cytokine expression in human blood monocyte subpopulations: a polymerase chain reaction analysis. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v87.1.373.373
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.