Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 352

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): long-term follow-up of the GIMEMA ALL 0288 randomized study

Annino, Luciana, Vegna, Maria Luce, Camera, Andrea, Specchia, Giorgina, Visani, Giuseppe, Fioritoni, Giuseppe, Ferrara, Felicetto, Peta, Antonio, Ciolli, Stefania, Deplano, Wilma, Fabbiano, Francesco, Sica, Simona, Di Raimondo, Francesco, Cascavilla, Nicola, Tabilio, Antonio, Leoni, Pietro, Invernizzi, Rosangela, Baccarani, Michele, Rotoli, Bruno, Amadori, Sergio, Mandelli, Franco·2002·Blood

Abstract

The GIMEMA ALL 0288 trial was designed to evaluate the impact of a 7-day prednisone (PDN) pretreatment on complete remission (CR) achievement and length, the influence of the addition of cyclophosphamide (random I) to a conventional 4-drug induction on CR rate and duration, and whether an early post-CR intensification (random II) by an 8-drug consolidation could improve CR duration. Median follow-up of this study was 7.3 years. From January 1988 to April 1994, among 794 adult (> 12 but < 60 years) patients registered, 778 were eligible. Their median age was 27.5 years; 73% had B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and 22% had T-lineage disease; 18% showed associated myeloid markers; 47 of 216 analyzed patients (22%) had Philadelphia chromosome–positive ALL. Response to PDN pretreatment was observed in 65% of cases. CR was achieved in 627 patients (82%). Resistant patients and induction death rates were 11% and 7%, respectively. Random II was applied to 388 patients with CR; 201 had maintenance alone and 187 had consolidation followed by maintenance. The relapse rate was 60%; isolated central nervous system relapses were 8% of all CRs and 13% of all relapses. Median survival (overall survival [OS]), continuous complete remission (CCR), and disease-free survival (DFS) were 2.2, 2.4, and 2 years, respectively. PDN pretreatment response resulted the main independent factor influencing CR achievement, OS, CCR, and DFS; the addition of cyclophosphamide in induction significantly influenced CR achievement in a multivariate analysis. Neither induction intensification nor early consolidation appeared to influence CCR and DFS duration. For the first time PDN pretreatment response proved to be a powerful factor predicting disease outcome in adult ALL patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood.v99.3.863

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 352

Metadata

Authors
Annino, L., Vegna, M. L., Camera, A., Specchia, G., Visani, G., Fioritoni, G., Ferrara, F., Peta, A., Ciolli, S., Deplano, W., Fabbiano, F., Sica, S., Di Raimondo, F., Cascavilla, N., Tabilio, A., Leoni, P., Invernizzi, R., Baccarani, M., Rotoli, B., Amadori, S., & Mandelli, F.
Venue
Blood
Published
2002-02-01
Volume
99
Issue
3
Pages
863-871
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2107685938
Cited by
352
References
1
FWCI
17.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): long-term follow-up of the GIMEMA ALL 0288 randomized study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.v99.3.863
The paper
Annino, L., Vegna, M. L., Camera, A., Specchia, G., Visani, G., Fioritoni, G., Ferrara, F., Peta, A., Ciolli, S., Deplano, W., Fabbiano, F., Sica, S., Di Raimondo, F., Cascavilla, N., Tabilio, A., Leoni, P., Invernizzi, R., Baccarani, M., Rotoli, B., . . . Mandelli, F. (2002). Treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): long-term follow-up of the GIMEMA ALL 0288 randomized study. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v99.3.863

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.