Cited by 29Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchReproductive System and PregnancyPregnancy and preeclampsia studies

High risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with a persistent lupus anticoagulant

Open access
Gebhart, Johanna, Posch, Florian, Koder, Silvia, Quehenberger, Peter, Perkmann, Thomas, Kuessel, Lorenz, Ay, Cihan, Pabinger, Ingrid·2019·Blood Advances

Abstract

Lupus anticoagulant (LA) has been associated with pregnancy complications and pregnancy loss. Identification of predictive factors could aid in deciding on therapeutic management. To identify risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk women with persistently positive LA, we prospectively followed 82 women of childbearing age, of whom 23 had 40 pregnancies within the Vienna Lupus Anticoagulant and Thrombosis Study. Pregnancy complications occurred in 28/40 (70%) pregnancies, including 22 (55%) spontaneous abortions (<10th week of gestation [WOG]: n = 12, 10th to 24th WOG: n = 10) and 6 deliveries <34th WOG (15%, 3 due to severe preeclampsia/HELLP [hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and a low platelet count] syndrome, 3 due to placental insufficiency). One abortion was followed by catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome. Neither a history of pregnancy complications nor of thrombosis, or prepregnancy antiphospholipid antibody levels were associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. In logistic regression analysis, higher age was associated with a lower risk of adverse pregnancy outcome (per 5 years’ increase: odds ratio [OR] = 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-0.87), a high Rosner index (index of circulating anticoagulant) predicted an increased risk (OR = 4.51, 95% CI: 1.08-18.93). Live birth rate was 15/28 (54%) in women on the combination of low-molecular-weight heparin and low-dose aspirin and 3/12 (25%) in those with no treatment or a single agent. We conclude that the risk of severe, even life-threatening pregnancy complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes is very high in women with persistent LA. A high Rosner index indicates an increased risk. Improved treatment options for women with persistently positive LA are urgently needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018026948

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • aCL are generally regarded as less symptomatic than LA or aB2GPI.

    “which implies that aCL are generally regarded as less symptomatic than their conventional aPL counterparts.”

    From Single or triple positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies in “carriers” or symptomatic patients: Untangling the knot (2021) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) calls LA a major risk factor for pregnancy complications, which lends limited support to distinguishing it from aCL. But the Results say that neither aCL nor aβ2GPI antibody levels appeared predictive in this LA-positive cohort, and the Discussion cautions against generalizing to patients with isolated aCL or aβ2GPI. The paper therefore does not support the broader claim that aCL is generally less symptomatic than both. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the literature, among aPL, isolated LA and aB2GPI are generally found to be associated with higher thrombotic risk than aCL.

    “In the literature, 5-­ 8 among the aPL, isolated LA and aB2GPI are generally found to be associated with higher thrombotic risk than aCL.”

    From Single or triple positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies in “carriers” or symptomatic patients: Untangling the knot (2021) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says antiphospholipid antibodies are associated with a prothrombotic state, but does not compare the thrombotic risks of isolated LA, anti-β2GPI, and aCL. The Discussion (page unavailable) concerns pregnancy outcomes in LA-positive women and says its findings cannot be generalized to isolated aCL- or anti-β2GPI-positive patients. Searches for the antibody-specific thrombotic-risk comparison found no passage addressing it. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, et al. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4(2):295-306.
  2. Abou-Nassar K, Carrier M, Ramsay T, Rodger MA. The association between antiphospholipid antibodies and placenta mediated complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Res. 2011;128(1):77-85.
  3. De Carolis S, Tabacco S, Rizzo F, et al. Antiphospholipid syndrome: an update on risk factors for pregnancy outcome. Autoimmun Rev. 2018;17(10): 956-966.
  4. Alijotas-Reig J, Ferrer-Oliveras R, Ruffatti A, et al; EUROAPS Study Group Collaborators. The European Registry on Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome (EUROAPS): a survey of 247 consecutive cases. Autoimmun Rev. 2015;14(5):387-395.
  5. Mekinian A, Alijotas-Reig J, Carrat F, et al; on the behalf of the SNFMI and the European Forum on Antiphospholipid Antibodies. Refractory obstetrical antiphospholipid syndrome: features, treatment and outcome in a European multicenter retrospective study. Autoimmun Rev. 2017;16(7):730-734.
  6. Ruffatti A, Tonello M, Visentin MS, et al. Risk factors for pregnancy failure in patients with anti-phospholipid syndrome treated with conventional therapies: a multicentre, case-control study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(9):1684-1689.
  7. Yelnik CM, Laskin CA, Porter TF, et al. Lupus anticoagulant is the main predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes in aPL-positive patients: validation of PROMISSE study results. Lupus Sci Med. 2016;3(1):e000131.
  8. Ruffatti A, Calligaro A, Hoxha A, et al. Laboratory and clinical features of pregnant women with antiphospholipid syndrome and neonatal outcome. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010;62(3):302-307.
  9. Helgadottir LB, Skjeldestad FE, Jacobsen AF, Sandset PM, Jacobsen EM. The association of antiphospholipid antibodies with intrauterine fetal death: a case-control study. Thromb Res. 2012;130(1):32-37.
  10. Deguchi M, Yamada H, Sugiura-Ogasawara M, et al. Factors associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with antiphospholipid syndrome: A multicenter study. J Reprod Immunol. 2017;122:21-27.
  11. Fredi M, Andreoli L, Aggogeri E, et al. Risk factors for adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in women with confirmed aPL positivity: results from a multicenter study of 283 pregnancies. Front Immunol. 2018;9:864.
  12. Wilson WA, Gharavi AE, Koike T, et al. International consensus statement on preliminary classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome: report of an international workshop. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42(7):1309-1311.
  13. Peeters LE, Daeseleire E, Devreese M, et al. Residues of chlortetracycline, doxycycline and sulfadiazine-trimethoprim in intestinal content and feces of pigs due to cross-contamination of feed. BMC Vet Res. 2016;12(1):209.
  14. Wenzel C, Stoiser B, Locker GJ, et al. Frequent development of lupus anticoagulants in critically ill patients treated under intensive care conditions. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(4):763-770.
  15. Rosner E, Pauzner R, Lusky A, Modan M, Many A. Detection and quantitative evaluation of lupus circulating anticoagulant activity. Thromb Haemost. 1987;57(2):144-147.
  16. Lockshin MD, Kim M, Laskin CA, et al. Prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome by the presence of lupus anticoagulant, but not anticardiolipin antibody, in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(7):2311-2318.
  17. Chauleur C, Galanaud JP, Alonso S, et al. Observational study of pregnant women with a previous spontaneous abortion before the 10th gestation week with and without antiphospholipid antibodies. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(4):699-706.
  18. Bouvier S, Cochery-Nouvellon E, Lavigne-Lissalde G, et al. Comparative incidence of pregnancy outcomes in treated obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: the NOH-APS observational study. Blood. 2014;123(3):404-413.
  19. Espinosa G, Cervera R. Current treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome: lights and shadows. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11(10):586-596.
  20. Rai R, Cohen H, Dave M, Regan L. Randomised controlled trial of aspirin and aspirin plus heparin in pregnant women with recurrent miscarriage associated with phospholipid antibodies (or antiphospholipid antibodies). BMJ. 1997;314(7076):253-257.
  21. Kutteh WH. Antiphospholipid antibody-associated recurrent pregnancy loss: treatment with heparin and low-dose aspirin is superior to low-dose aspirin alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(5):1584-1589.
  22. Farquharson RG, Quenby S, Greaves M. Antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy: a randomized, controlled trial of treatment. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 100(3):408-413.
  23. Laskin CA, Spitzer KA, Clark CA, et al. Low molecular weight heparin and aspirin for recurrent pregnancy loss: results from the randomized, controlled HepASA Trial. J Rheumatol. 2009;36(2):279-287.
  24. Rai R, Regan L. Antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy: a randomized, controlled trial of treatment. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(6):1354.
  25. von Dadelszen P, Kent N. Antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy: a randomized, controlled trial of treatment. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(3):618.
  26. Carp HJ. Low molecular weight heparin and aspirin for recurrent pregnancy loss: results from the HepASA trial. J Rheumatol. 2010;37(1):202, author reply 203.
  27. Roubey RA. Heparin and aspirin versus aspirin alone for prevention of recurrent pregnancy loss. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2010;12(1):1-3.
  28. Lassere M, Empson M. Treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy--a systematic review of randomized therapeutic trials. Thromb Res. 2004; 114(5-6):419-426.
  29. Ziakas PD, Pavlou M, Voulgarelis M. Heparin treatment in antiphospholipid syndrome with recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(6):1256-1262.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gebhart, J., Posch, F., Koder, S., Quehenberger, P., Perkmann, T., Kuessel, L., Ay, C., & Pabinger, I.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
  • Division of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, and
Venue
Blood Advances
Published
2019-03-05
Volume
3
Issue
5
Pages
769-776
ISSN
  • 2473-9529 (ISSN-L)
  • 2473-9537
OpenAlex
W2918224126
Cited by
29
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Blood Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Austrian Science Fund (SFB‐54)
  • Universität Wien
  • Medizinische Universität Wien
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
lupus anticoagulant, adverse pregnancy outcomes, miscarriage, preeclampsia, HELLP syndrome, placental insufficiency, antiphospholipid syndrome, low molecular weight heparin, low-dose aspirin, live birth rate, maternal age, pregnancy complications
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review