Cited by 72Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsVasculitis and related conditions

Increased mortality in patients with the lupus anticoagulant: the Vienna Lupus Anticoagulant and Thrombosis Study (LATS)

Gebhart, Johanna, Posch, Florian, Koder, Silvia, Perkmann, Thomas, Quehenberger, Peter, Zoghlami, Claudia, Ay, Cihan, Pabinger, Ingrid·2015·Blood

Abstract

Data on the clinical course of lupus anticoagulant (LA)-positive individuals with or without thrombotic manifestations or pregnancy complications are limited. To investigate mortality rates and factors that might influence mortality, we conducted a prospective observational study of LA-positive individuals. In total, 151 patients (82% female) were followed for a median of 8.2 years; 30 of the patients (20%) developed 32 thromboembolic events (15 arterial and 17 venous events) and 20 patients (13%) died. In univariable analysis, new onset of thrombosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 8.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.46-22.16) was associated with adverse survival. Thrombosis remained a strong adverse prognostic factor after multivariable adjustment for age and hypertension (HR = 5.95; 95% CI, 2.43-14.95). Concomitant autoimmune diseases, anticoagulant treatment at baseline, or positivity for anticardiolipin- or anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies were not associated with mortality. In a relative survival analysis, our cohort of LA positives showed a persistently worse survival in comparison with an age-, sex-, and study-inclusion-year-matched Austrian reference population. The cumulative relative survival was 95.0% (95% CI, 88.5-98.8) after 5 years and 87.7% (95% CI, 76.3-95.6) after 10 years. We conclude that occurrence of a thrombotic event is associated with higher mortality in patients with LA. Consequently, the prevention of thromboembolic events in LA positives might improve survival.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2014-11-611129

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gebhart, J., Posch, F., Koder, S., Perkmann, T., Quehenberger, P., Zoghlami, C., Ay, C., & Pabinger, I.
Affiliations
  • Department of Medicine I, Clinical Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology; and
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Venue
Blood
Published
2015-05-28
Volume
125
Issue
22
Pages
3477-3483
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2023431216
Cited by
72
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Blood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vasculitis and related conditions
Keywords
lupus anticoagulant, mortality, thrombosis, thromboembolic events, survival, prognostic factors, arterial thrombosis, venous thrombosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Anticoagulants, Austria, Cause of Death, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review