Cited by 130Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

Pevonedistat plus azacitidine vs azacitidine alone in higher-risk MDS/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia or low-blast-percentage AML

Open access
Adès, Lionel, Girshova, Larisa, Doronin, Vadim A., Díez-Campelo, María, Valcárcel, David, Kambhampati, Suman, Viniou, Nora-Athina, Woszczyk, Dariusz +11 more·2022·Blood Advances

Abstract

PANTHER is a global, randomized phase 3 trial of pevonedistat+azacitidine (n = 227) vs azacitidine monotherapy (n = 227) in patients with newly diagnosed higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS; n = 324), higher-risk chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (n = 27), or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 20% to 30% blasts (n = 103). The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). In the intent-to-treat population, the median EFS was 17.7 months with pevonedistat+azacitidine vs 15.7 months with azacitidine (hazard ratio [HR], 0.968; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.757-1.238; P = .557) and in the higher-risk MDS cohort, median EFS was 19.2 vs 15.6 months (HR, 0.887; 95% CI, 0.659-1.193; P = .431). Median overall survival (OS) in the higher-risk MDS cohort was 21.6 vs 17.5 months (HR, 0.785; P = .092), and in patients with AML with 20% to 30% blasts was 14.5 vs 14.7 months (HR, 1.107; P = .664). In a post hoc analysis, median OS in the higher-risk MDS cohort for patients receiving >3 cycles was 23.8 vs 20.6 months (P = .021) and for >6 cycles was 27.1 vs 22.5 months (P = .008). No new safety signals were identified, and the azacitidine dose intensity was maintained. Common hematologic grade ≥3 treatment emergent adverse events were anemia (33% vs 34%), neutropenia (31% vs 33%), and thrombocytopenia (30% vs 30%). These results underscore the importance of large, randomized controlled trials in these heterogeneous myeloid diseases and the value of continuing therapy for >3 cycles. The trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03268954.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007334

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AZA alone continues to represent standard of care in MDS because all recent studies have failed to improve median OS compared to monotherapy.

    “AZA alone continues to represent the standard of care in MDS because all recent studies have failed to improve the median OS compared to monotherapy.”

    From Long‐term follow‐up and combined Phase 2 results of eprenetapopt and azacitidine in patients with <i>TP53</i> mutant MDS/AML (2025) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Discussion describes azacitidine alone as standard care and says this phase 3 combination trial did not meet its primary endpoint. The Results (Efficacy) report no statistically significant OS benefit in higher-risk MDS, although median OS was numerically longer with the combination (21.6 versus 17.5 months). The paper does not establish that all recent studies failed to improve median OS across MDS generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Combination therapies in MDS including HDAC inhibitors, lenalidomide, pevonedistat, and anthracyclines have not improved results.

    “Combination therapies in this setting have included HDAC inhibitors, 33 , 34 , 35 lenalidomide, 36 pevonedistat, 37 and anthracyclines 38 all without improved results.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al, eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2017. Based on November 2019 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER website. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; April 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adès, L., Girshova, L., Doronin, V. A., Díez-Campelo, M., Valcárcel, D., Kambhampati, S., Viniou, N.-A., Woszczyk, D., De Paz Arias, R., Symeonidis, A., Anagnostopoulos, A., Munhoz, E. C., Platzbecker, U., Santini, V., Fram, R. J., Yuan, Y., Friedlander, S., Faller, D. V., & Sekeres, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Federal Almazov North-West Medical Research Centre (RU)
  • City Clinical Hospital (RU)
  • 4Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain;
  • Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES)
  • Research Medical Center (US)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • University of Opole (PL)
  • 9Hematology, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IDIPaz, Madrid, Spain;
  • General University Hospital of Patras (GR)
  • 11Hematology Department, General Hospital “George Papanikolaou,” Thessaloniki, Greece;
  • Hospital Erasto Gaertner (BR)
  • University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT)
  • 15Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc (TDCA), Lexington, MA; and
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Adès, Lionel
Venue
Blood Advances
Published
2022-09-02
Volume
6
Issue
17
Pages
5132-5145
ISSN
  • 2473-9529 (ISSN-L)
  • 2473-9537
OpenAlex
W4283264931
Cited by
130
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
18.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Blood Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A.
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
pevonedistat, azacitidine, myelodysplastic syndrome, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, event-free survival, overall survival, treatment-emergent adverse events, dose intensity, hematologic toxicity
MeSH terms
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic, Azacitidine, Cyclopentanes, Drug Therapy, Combination, Humans, Pyrimidines, Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review