Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Automated quantification of radiological patterns predicts survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Maldonado, Fabien, Moua, Teng, Rajagopalan, Srinivasan, Karwoski, Ronald A., Raghunath, Sushravya, Decker, Paul A., Hartman, Thomas E., Bartholmai, Brian J., Robb, Richard A., Ryu, Jay H.·2014·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Accurate assessment of prognosis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis remains elusive due to significant individual radiological and physiological variability. We hypothesised that short-term radiological changes may be predictive of survival. We explored the use of CALIPER (Computer-Aided Lung Informatics for Pathology Evaluation and Rating), a novel software tool developed by the Biomedical Imaging Resource Laboratory at the Mayo Clinic Rochester (Rochester, MN, USA) for the analysis and quantification of parenchymal lung abnormalities on high-resolution computed tomography. We assessed baseline and follow-up (time-points 1 and 2, respectively) high-resolution computed tomography scans in 55 selected idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients and correlated CALIPER-quantified measurements with expert radiologists’ assessments and clinical outcomes. Findings of interval change (mean 289 days) in volume of reticular densities (hazard ratio 1.91, p=0.006), total volume of interstitial abnormalities (hazard ratio 1.70, p=0.003) and per cent total interstitial abnormalities (hazard ratio 1.52, p=0.017) as quantified by CALIPER were predictive of survival after a median follow-up of 2.4 years. Radiologist interpretation of short-term global interstitial lung disease progression, but not specific radiological features, was also predictive of mortality. These data demonstrate the feasibility of quantifying interval short-term changes on high-resolution computed tomography and their possible use as independent predictors of survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.00071812

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Maldonado, F., Moua, T., Rajagopalan, S., Karwoski, R. A., Raghunath, S., Decker, P. A., Hartman, T. E., Bartholmai, B. J., Robb, R. A., & Ryu, J. H.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2013-04-05
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
204-212
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2155777150
Cited by
264
References
25
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated quantification of radiological patterns predicts survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.00071812
The paper
Maldonado, F., Moua, T., Rajagopalan, S., Karwoski, R. A., Raghunath, S., Decker, P. A., Hartman, T. E., Bartholmai, B. J., Robb, R. A., & Ryu, J. H. (2014). Automated quantification of radiological patterns predicts survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00071812

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.