Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Safety and efficacy of exercise training in various forms of pulmonary hypertension

Open access
Grünig, Ekkehard, Lichtblau, Mona, Ehlken, Nicola, Ghofrani, Hossein A., Reichenberger, Frank, Staehler, Gerd, Halank, Michael, Fischer, Christine, Seyfarth, Hans-Jürgen, Klose, Hans, Meyer, Andreas, Sorichter, Stephan, Wilkens, Heinrike, Rosenkranz, Stephan, Opitz, Christian, Leuchte, Hanno, Karger, Gabriele, Speich, Rudolf, Nagel, Christian·2012·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

The objective of this prospective study was to assess safety and efficacy of exercise training in a large cohort of patients with different forms and World Health Organization (WHO) functional classes of chronic pulmonary hypertension (PH). 183 patients with PH (pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), chronic thromboembolic PH and PH due to respiratory or left heart diseases received exercise training in hospital for 3 weeks and continued at home. Adverse events have been monitored during the in-hospital training programme. Efficacy parameters were evaluated at baseline, and after 3 and 15 weeks. After 3 and 15 weeks, patients significantly improved the distance walked in 6 min (6MWD) compared to baseline, scores of quality of life, WHO functional class, peak oxygen consumption, oxygen pulse, heart rate and systolic pulmonary artery pressure at rest and maximal workload. The improvement in 6MWD was similar in patients with different PH forms and functional classes. Even in severely affected patients (WHO functional class IV), exercise training was highly effective. Adverse events, such as respiratory infections, syncope or presyncope, occurred in 13% of patients. Exercise training in PH is an effective but not a completely harmless add-on therapy, even in severely diseased patients, and should be closely monitored.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.00123711

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 238

Metadata

Authors
Grünig, E., Lichtblau, M., Ehlken, N., Ghofrani, H. A., Reichenberger, F., Staehler, G., Halank, M., Fischer, C., Seyfarth, H.-J., Klose, H., Meyer, A., Sorichter, S., Wilkens, H., Rosenkranz, S., Opitz, C., Leuchte, H., Karger, G., Speich, R., & Nagel, C.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2012-02-09
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
84-92
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2106203073
Cited by
238
References
1
FWCI
18.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Safety and efficacy of exercise training in various forms of pulmonary hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.00123711
The paper
Grünig, E., Lichtblau, M., Ehlken, N., Ghofrani, H. A., Reichenberger, F., Staehler, G., Halank, M., Fischer, C., Seyfarth, H.-J., Klose, H., Meyer, A., Sorichter, S., Wilkens, H., Rosenkranz, S., Opitz, C., Leuchte, H., Karger, G., Speich, R., & Nagel, C. (2012). Safety and efficacy of exercise training in various forms of pulmonary hypertension. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00123711

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.