The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A randomised clinical trial of nebulised tobramycin or colistin in cystic fibrosis
Open accessAbstract
Chronic infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa is associated with progressive deterioration in lung function in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. The purpose of this trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of tobramycin nebuliser solution (TNS) and nebulised colistin in CF patients chronically infected with P. aeruginosa. One-hundred and fifteen patients, aged ≥6 yrs, were randomised to receive either TNS or colistin, twice daily for 4 weeks. The primary end point was an evaluation of the relative change in lung function from baseline, as measured by forced expiratory volume in one second % predicted. Secondary end points included changes in sputum P. aeruginosa density, tobramycin/colistin minimum inhibitory concentrations and safety assessments. TNS produced a mean 6.7% improvement in lung function (p=0.006), whilst there was no significant improvement in the colistin-treated patients (mean change 0.37%). Both nebulised antibiotic regimens produced a significant decrease in the sputum P. aeruginosa density, and there was no development of highly resistant strains over the course of the study. The safety profile for both nebulised antibiotics was good. Tobramycin nebuliser solution significantly improved lung function of patients with cystic fibrosis chronically infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but colistin did not, in this study of 1-month's duration. Both treatments reduced the bacterial load.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prediction of mortality in patients with cystic fibrosis
Kerem, E., Reisman, J., Corey, M., Canny, G. J., & Levison, H. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199204303261804 · Cited by 993
Cited by
Pathophysiology and Management of Pulmonary Infections in Cystic Fibrosis
Gibson, R. L., Burns, J. L., & Ramsey, B. W. (2003) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200304-505so · Cited by 1,633
O'Sullivan, B. P., & Freedman, S. D. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60327-5 · Cited by 1,320
Yankaskas, J. R., Marshall, B. C., Sufian, B., Simon, R. H., & Rodman, D. (2004) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.125.1_suppl.1s · Cited by 579
Inhalation drug delivery devices: technology update
Garcia-Contreras, L., Ibrahim, M., & Verma, R. (2015) · Medical Devices: Evidence and Research · doi:10.2147/mder.s48888 · Cited by 306
Heijerman, H., Westerman, E., Conway, S., & Touw, D. (2009) · Journal of Cystic Fibrosis · doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2009.04.005 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Hodson, M. E., Gallagher, C. G., & Govan, J. R. W.
- Venue
- European Respiratory Journal
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 658-664
- ISSN
- 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3003
- OpenAlex
- W2165028346
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A randomised clinical trial of nebulised tobramycin or colistin in cystic fibrosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.02.00248102
- The paper
- Hodson, M. E., Gallagher, C. G., & Govan, J. R. W. (2002). A randomised clinical trial of nebulised tobramycin or colistin in cystic fibrosis. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.02.00248102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.