Cited by 1,277Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseasesSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD: 2003 update

Open access
Fabbri, L.M., Hurd, S.S.·2003·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) programme was initiated in January 1997 to increase awareness of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to decrease morbidity and mortality from this chronic lung disorder.One strategy to help achieve the objectives of the GOLD programme is to provide healthcare workers, healthcare authorities and the general public with state-of-the-art information about COPD and specific recommendations on the most appropriate management and prevention strategies.The GOLD Workshop Report, Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD [1] was published in April 2001.It was prepared by a panel of experts nominated by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health and the World Health Organization with the aim of providing the best validated current concepts of COPD pathogenesis and the best available evidence on the most appropriate management and prevention strategies.In an effort to keep the GOLD Workshop Report as up to date as possible, GOLD assembled a Scientific Committee whose aim was to review clinical research that has an impact on COPD management.The initial review included publications that were published in June 2000 (approximately the time of completion of the 2001 report) through to March 2003.The results of the first 2 yrs of activity were posted on the GOLD website (www.goldcopd.com) in July 2003 [2].Each year, a new update report will be posted.The GOLD Scientific Committee will also prepare a revision of the entire GOLD Workshop Report approximately every 5 yrs.The process for the first complete revision (to appear in 2006) will be developed in the autumn of 2003.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.03.00063703

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fabbri, L. M., & Hurd, S. S.
Affiliations
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2003-07
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
1-1
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2123084333
Cited by
1,277
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 119 · 2013: 136 · 2012: 101
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Respiratory Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COPD diagnosis, COPD management, COPD prevention, COPD pathogenesis
MeSH terms
Humans, Global Health, Evidence-Based Medicine, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review