The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reproducibility of exhaled nitric oxide measurements in healthy and asthmatic adults and children
Open accessAbstract
Airway inflammation in asthma is not measured routinely in clinical practice. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FE NO), a marker of airway inflammation, is increasingly used as an outcome measure in asthma intervention studies and yet the reproducibility of FE NO measurements is unknown. The reproducibility, daytoday, diurnal variation and perception of standardised FE NO measurements were examined in 59 subjects (40 children aged 7–13 yrs and 19 adults aged 18–60 yrs), both healthy (n=30) and with mild (n=29) asthma. FE NO was measured on five consecutive days (four measurements on the same day) for adults and twice on the same day for children. The coefficient of reproducibility expressed as the mean pooled standard deviation (n=59, 675 estimations) was 2.11 parts per billion (ppb) and intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.99 in both children and adults. FE NO was significantly higher in asthma subjects (32.3 ppb) than in healthy subjects (16.3 ppb). There was no diurnal or daytoday variation, or a learning effect, as the result of FE NO measurements were identical at results of the beginning and at the end of the study. It was concluded that fractional exhaled nitric oxide measurements are simple, reproducible, free from diurnal and daytoday variation, and acceptable by both healthy and asthmatic adults and children, as a part of their routine visit to a physician.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2005) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200406-710st · Cited by 3,203
Dweik, R. A., Boggs, P. B., Erzurum, S. C., Irvin, C. G., Leigh, M. W., Lundberg, J. O., Olin, A.-C., Plummer, A. L., & Taylor, D. R. (2011) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.9120-11st · Cited by 2,539
Reddel, H. K., Taylor, D. R., Bateman, E. D., Boulet, L.-P., Boushey, H. A., Busse, W. W., Casale, T. B., Chanez, P., Enright, P. L., Gibson, P. G., et al. (2009) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200801-060st · Cited by 1,918
Exhaled nitric oxide measurements: clinical application and interpretation
Taylor, D. R., Pijnenburg, M. W., Smith, A. D., & Jongste, J. C. D. (2006) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.2005.056093 · Cited by 507
Szefler, S. J., Wenzel, S., Brown, R., Erzurum, S. C., Fahy, J. V., Hamilton, R. G., Hunt, J. F., Kita, H., Liu, A. H., Panettieri, R. A., et al. (2012) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2011.12.979 · Cited by 395
Metadata
- Authors
- Kharitonov, S. A., Gonio, F., Kelly, C., Meah, S., & Barnes, P. J.
- Venue
- European Respiratory Journal
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 433-438
- ISSN
- 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3003
- OpenAlex
- W2134129134
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproducibility of exhaled nitric oxide measurements in healthy and asthmatic adults and children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.03.00066903a
- The paper
- Kharitonov, S. A., Gonio, F., Kelly, C., Meah, S., & Barnes, P. J. (2003). Reproducibility of exhaled nitric oxide measurements in healthy and asthmatic adults and children. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.03.00066903a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.