The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The ENFUMOSA cross-sectional European multicentre study of the clinical phenotype of chronic severe asthma
Open accessAbstract
Since severe asthma is a poorly understood, major health problem, 12 clinical specialist centres in nine European countries formed a European Network For Understanding Mechanisms Of Severe Asthma (ENFUMOSA). In a cross-sectional observational study, a total of 163 subjects with severe asthma were compared with 158 subjects whose asthma was controlled by low doses of inhaled corticosteroids (median dose of beclomethasone equivalents 666 µg). Despite being treated with higher doses of inhaled corticosteroids (median dose 1773 µg) and for a third of the severe asthmatics also being treated with regular, oral-steroid therapy (median daily dose 19 mg), the subjects with severe asthma met the inclusion criteria. The criteria required subjects to have undergone at least one asthma exacerbation in the past year requiring oral steroid treatment. Females dominated the severe asthma group (female/male ratio 4.4:1 versus 1.6:1 in the controlled asthmatics), and compared with controlled asthmatics, they had a predominantly neutrophilic inflammation (sputum neutrophils, 36 versus 28%) and evidence of ongoing mediator release but less atopy. From these findings and other physiological and clinical data reported in this paper, it is suggested that severe asthma might be a different form of asthma rather than an increase in asthma symptoms. The findings prompt for longitudinal studies and interventions to define the mechanisms in severe asthma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma
Chung, K. F., Wenzel, S. E., Brozek, J. L., Bush, A., Castro, M., Sterk, P. J., Adcock, I. M., Bateman, E. D., Bel, E. H., Bleecker, E. R., et al. (2014) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00202013 · Cited by 3,926
Humbert, M., Beasley, R., Ayres, J., Slavin, R., Hébert, J., Bousquet, J., Beeh, K. ‐., Ramos, S., Canonica, G. W., Hedgecock, S., et al. (2005) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00772.x · Cited by 1,123
Bousquet, J., Mantzouranis, E., Cruz, A. A., Aït-Khaled, N., Baena-Cagnani, C. E., Bleecker, E. R., Brightling, C. E., Burney, P., Bush, A., Busse, W. W., et al. (2010) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2010.07.019 · Cited by 741
Clinical and inflammatory characteristics of the European U-BIOPRED adult severe asthma cohort
Shaw, D. E., Sousa, A. R., Fowler, S. J., Fleming, L. J., Roberts, G., Corfield, J., Pandis, I., Bansal, A. T., Bel, E. H., Auffray, C., et al. (2015) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/13993003.00779-2015 · Cited by 555
Uncontrolled asthma: A review of the prevalence, disease burden and options for treatment
Peters, S. P., Ferguson, G., Deniz, Y., & Reisner, C. (2006) · Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2006.03.031 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- The ENFUMOSA Study Group
- Venue
- European Respiratory Journal
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 470-477
- ISSN
- 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3003
- OpenAlex
- W2308777632
- Cited by
- 759
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ENFUMOSA cross-sectional European multicentre study of the clinical phenotype of chronic severe asthma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.03.00261903
- The paper
- The ENFUMOSA Study Group. (2003). The ENFUMOSA cross-sectional European multicentre study of the clinical phenotype of chronic severe asthma. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.03.00261903
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.