The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patient-physician communication about end-of-life care for patients with severe COPD
Abstract
Since patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) infrequently discuss treatment preferences about end-of-life care with physicians, the goal of the present study was to identify which specific areas of communication about end-of-life care occur between patients with severe COPD and their physicians, and how patients rate the quality of this communication. A total of 115 patients with oxygen-dependent COPD, identified in pulmonary clinics in three hospitals and through an oxygen delivery company, were enrolled in this study. A 17‐item quality of communication questionnaire (QOC) was administered to patients, along with other measures, including satisfaction with care. The patients reported that most physicians do not discuss how long the patients have to live, what dying might be like or patients' spirituality. Patients rated physicians highly at listening and answering questions. Areas patients rated relatively low included discussing prognosis, what dying might be like and spirituality/religion. Patients' assessments of physicians' overall communication and communication about treatment correlated well with the QOC. Patients' overall satisfaction with care also correlated significantly with the QOC. In conclusion, this study identifies areas of communication that physicians do not address and areas that patients rate poorly, including talking about prognosis, dying and spirituality. These areas may provide targets for interventions to improve communication about end-of-life care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Future studies should determine the responsiveness of these items to interventions, and the effect such interventions have on patient satisfaction and quality of care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Vestbo, J., Hurd, S. S., Agustí, A. G., Jones, P. W., Vogelmeier, C., Anzueto, A., Barnes, P. J., Fabbri, L. M., Martinez, F. J., Nishimura, M., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201204-0596pp · Cited by 15,983
Fallowfield, L., Jenkins, V., Farewell, V., Saul, J., Duffy, A., & Eves, R. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07810-8 · Cited by 854
Physicians and Patient Spirituality: Professional Boundaries, Competency, and Ethics
Post, S. G., Puchalski, C. M., & Larson, D. B. (2000) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-132-7-200004040-00010 · Cited by 417
Cited by
Efficacy of advance care planning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Houben, C. H. M., Spruit, M. A., Groenen, M. T. J., Wouters, E. F. M., & Janssen, D. J. A. (2014) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2014.01.008 · Cited by 765
Curtis, J. R., Back, A. L., Ford, D. W., Downey, L., Shannon, S. E., Doorenbos, A. Z., Kross, E. K., Reinke, L. F., Feemster, L. C., Edlund, B., et al. (2013) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.282081 · Cited by 426
Self-citationCarson, S. S., Cox, C. E., Wallenstein, S., Hanson, L. C., Danis, M., Tulsky, J. A., Chai, E., & Nelson, J. E. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.8474 · Cited by 352
Do patients want doctors to talk about spirituality? A systematic literature review
Best, M., Butow, P., & Olver, I. (2015) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.04.017 · Cited by 279
Engelberg, R., Downey, L., & Curtis, J. R. (2006) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1089/jpm.2006.9.1086 · Cited by 195
Self-citationAssociation of depression and life-sustaining treatment preferences in patients with COPD
Stapleton, R. D., Nielsen, E. L., Engelberg, R. A., Patrick, D. L., & Curtis, J. R. (2005) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.127.1.328 · Cited by 121
Self-citationWhite, D. B., Cua, S. M., Walk, R., Pollice, L., Weissfeld, L., Hong, S., Landefeld, C. S., & Arnold, R. M. (2012) · American Journal of Critical Care · doi:10.4037/ajcc2012223 · Cited by 120
Detering, K., Silvester, W., Corke, C., Milnes, S., Fullam, R., Lewis, V., & Renton, J. (2014) · BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care · doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000450 · Cited by 92
Lee, R. Y., Kross, E. K., Downey, L., Paul, S. R., Heywood, J., Nielsen, E. L., Okimoto, K., Brumback, L. C., Merel, S. E., Engelberg, R. A., et al. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.5088 · Cited by 44
Self-citationPalliative care understanding and end‐of‐life decisions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Fahim, A., & Kastelik, J. A. (2014) · The Clinical Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1111/crj.12073 · Cited by 18
Curtis, J. R., Lee, R. Y., Brumback, L. C., Kross, E. K., Downey, L., Torrence, J., Heywood, J., LeDuc, N., Mallon Andrews, K., Im, J., et al. (2022) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2022.106879 · Cited by 12
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Curtis, J. R., Engelberg, R. A., Nielsen, E. L., Au, D. H., & Patrick, D. L.
- Venue
- European Respiratory Journal
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 200-205
- ISSN
- 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3003
- OpenAlex
- W1979287183
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 9.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
