Cited by 1,022Allergic Rhinitis and SensitizationAsthma and respiratory diseasesFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research

Prevalence and rate of diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in Europe

Open access
Bauchau, V., Durham, S.R.·2004·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

To measure the prevalence of allergic rhinitis among European adults and the proportion of undiagnosed subjects, a two-step, cross-sectional, population-based survey in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK was undertaken. Step one of the study involved screening for allergic rhinitis by telephone interview, based on history of symptoms and/or self-awareness of the condition. Step two undertook confirmation of allergic rhinitis in a subset of the subjects screened positive; this was performed by a clinical diagnosis conducted in three to five clinical centres per country, including specific immunoglobulin E tests and a disease-specific questionnaire. A total of 9,646 telephone interviews were conducted between February and April 2001. Self-awareness of allergic rhinitis was reported by 19% of the subjects. Physician-based diagnosis of allergic rhinitis was reported by 13% of the subjects. In step two, 725 clinical assessments were conducted between May and August 2001. A total of 411 of patients, who underwent step two, had investigator-confirmed allergic rhinitis. Among patients with investigator-confirmed allergic rhinitis, 45% had not reported a previous diagnosis by a physician. Prevalence of subjects with clinically confirmable allergic rhinitis estimated by combining step one and step two data ranged from 17% in Italy to 29% in Belgium with an overall value of 23%. This large-scale study confirms that allergic rhinitis has a high prevalence in western Europe and is frequently undiagnosed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.04.00013904

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bauchau and Durham diagnosed Belgian patients via serological IgE testing after a positive telephone screen and reported a Belgian allergic rhinitis prevalence of 28.5%, the highest among the European countries evaluated.

    “For example, Bauchau and Durham9 diagnosed Belgian patients via serological IgE testing after a positive telephone screen and reported that Belgium had an AR prevalence of 28.5% (the highest of the European countries evaluated).”

    From International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (2018) · cites this paper as [9]

    Step one: telephone interviews says people with a positive screen were invited for clinical examination. Step two: clinical diagnosis says that examination included blood IgE testing, but local investigators made diagnoses according to their usual practice—not by IgE testing alone. Step two: clinical examinations reports Belgium as highest at 29% (rounded); the passages do not state the claimed 28.5% exactly. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The prevalence of persistent allergic rhinitis was found to be higher in both Northern Europe and Northern China compared to their southern counterparts.

    “For example, the prevalence of persistent AR was found to be higher in both Northern Europe and Northern China compared to their southern counterparts.9,477”

    From International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (2018) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Discussion reports higher prevalence of allergic rhinitis overall in northern European countries than in southern ones. It does not make that geographic comparison specifically for persistent allergic rhinitis, and this study of Europe does not address Northern versus Southern China. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kleinbaum DG, Klein M. Logistic regression. 2nd Edn. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 2002.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bauchau, V., & Durham, S. R.
Affiliations
UCB Pharma (Belgium) (BE)
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2004-11
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
758-764
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2111692694
Cited by
1,022
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 66
FWCI
13.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Respiratory Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
UCB Pharma
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Keywords
allergic rhinitis, prevalence, underdiagnosis, physician diagnosis, self-reported symptoms, specific IgE, diagnosis, Western Europe, adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Belgium, Cross-Sectional Studies, Europe, Female, France, Germany, United Kingdom, Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial, Spain, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review