Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 74

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inspiratory fraction and exercise impairment in COPD patients GOLD stages II–III

Albuquerque, A. L. P., Nery, L. E., Villaça, D. S., Machado, T. Y. S., Oliveira, C. C., Paes, Â. T., Neder, J. A.·2006·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

The inspiratory-to-total lung capacity ratio or “inspiratory fraction” (inspiratory capacity(IC)/total lung capacity (TLC)) may be functionally more representative than traditional indices of resting airflow limitation and lung hyperinflation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In the present retrospective study, a comparison was made of the individual performance of post-bronchodilator IC, IC/TLC and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV 1 ) in predicting a severely reduced peak oxygen uptake ( V′ O 2 ; <60% predicted) in 44 COPD patients Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stages II-III (post-bronchodilator FEV 1 ranging from 31–79% pred). Patients with lower IC/TLC values (≤0.28) showed increased lung volumes and reduced exercise capacity as compared with other subjects. Following a multiple linear regression analysis, only IC/TLC and FEV 1 remained as independent predictors of V′ O 2 (r 2 = 0.33). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that an IC/TLC ≤0.28 had the highest specificity (89.6%), positive predictive value (80%) and overall accuracy (86.3%) in identifying patients with V′ O 2 <60% pred. In addition, the area under the ROC curve tended to be higher for IC/TLC than IC. In conclusion, post-bronchodilator total lung capacity-corrected inspiratory fraction provides useful information in addition to forced expiratory volume in one second and inspiratory capacity, to estimate the likelihood of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients to present with severely reduced maximal exercise capacity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.06.00040506

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 2005, Eur Respir J, 25, 188
  2. 10.1164/ajrccm.155.1.9001298 · DOI
  3. 10.1378/chest.100.2.307 · DOI
  4. 10.1378/chest.121.5.1434 · DOI
  5. 1992, Braz J Pneumol, 18, 10
  6. 10.1183/09031936.05.00034905 · DOI
  7. 1999, Braz J Med Biol Res, 32, 703, 10.1590/S0100-879X1999000600006 · DOI
  8. Ruppel GL. Lung volumes and gas distribution tests. In: Ruppel GL, ed. Manual of Pulmonary Function Testing. St. Louis, Mosby, 1998; pp. 69–94
  9. 10.1183/09031936.99.14613049 · DOI
  10. 1982, Med Sci Sports Exercise, 14, 377
  11. 10.2307/2531595 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1159/000050502 · DOI
  13. 10.1378/chest.124.5.1743 · DOI
  14. 2003, Chest, 117, 42S
  15. 1997, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 155, 1984, 10.1164/ajrccm.155.6.9196106 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1164/rccm.200206-583OC · DOI
  17. 10.1164/ajrccm.161.6.9905045 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Albuquerque, A. L. P., Nery, L. E., Villaça, D. S., Machado, T. Y. S., Oliveira, C. C., Paes, Â. T., & Neder, J. A.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2006-07-26
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
939-944
ISSN
  • 0903-1936
  • 1399-3003
Cited by
74
References
8
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.