The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A simple method to detect expiratory flow limitation during spontaneous breathing
Abstract
Patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often exhale along the same flow-volume curve during quiet breathing as during a forced expiratory vital capacity manoeuvre, and this has been taken as indicating flow limitation at rest. To obtain such curves, a body plethysmograph and the patient's co-operation are required. We propose a simple technique which does not entail these requirements. It consists in applying negative pressure at the mouth during a tidal expiration (NEP). Patients in whom NEP elicits an increase in flow throughout the expiration are not flow-limited. In contrast, patients in whom application of NEP does not elicit an increase in flow during most or part of the tidal expiration are considered as flow-limited. Using this technique, 26 stable COPD patients were studied sitting and supine. Eleven patients were flow-limited both seated and supine, eight were flow-limited only when supine, and seven were not flow-limited either seated or supine. Only 5 of 19 patients who were flow-limited seated and/or supine had severe ventilatory impairment (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) < 40% predicted). We conclude that the NEP technique provides a simple, rapid, and reliable method for detection of expiratory flow limitation in spontaneously breathing subjects, which does not require the patient's co-operation, and can be applied in different body positions both at rest and during muscular exercise. Our results also indicate a high prevalence of flow limitation in COPD patients at rest, particularly when supine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effect of aging alone on mechanical properties of the normal adult human lung
Knudson, R. J., Clark, D. F., Kennedy, T. C., & Knudson, D. E. (1977) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1977.43.6.1054 · Cited by 197
Cited by
Interpretative strategies for lung function tests
Pellegrino, R., Viegi, G., Brusasco, V., Crapo, R. O., Burgos, F., Casaburi, R., Coates, A., van der Grinten, C. P. M., Gustafsson, P., Hankinson, J., et al. (2005) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00035205 · Cited by 5,945
ATS/ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing
(2003) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.167.2.211 · Cited by 3,026
ATS/ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing
Ross, R. M. (2003) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.167.10.950 · Cited by 2,073
Diaz, O., Villafranca, C., Ghezzo, H., Borzone, G., Leiva, A., Milic-Emil, J., & Lisboa, C. (2000) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.16b14.x · Cited by 300
Eltayara, L., Becklake, M. R., Volta, C. A., & Milic-Emili, J. (1996) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.154.6.8970362 · Cited by 277
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Koulouris, N., Valta, P., Lavoie, A., Corbeil, C., Chasse, M., Braidy, J., & Milic-Emili, J.
- Venue
- European Respiratory Journal
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 1995-02-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 306-313
- ISSN
- 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3003
- OpenAlex
- W2050009026
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A simple method to detect expiratory flow limitation during spontaneous breathing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.95.08020306
- The paper
- Koulouris, N., Valta, P., Lavoie, A., Corbeil, C., Chasse, M., Braidy, J., & Milic-Emili, J. (1995). A simple method to detect expiratory flow limitation during spontaneous breathing. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.95.08020306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.