Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,592

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimal assessment and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The European Respiratory Society Task Force

Open access
Siafakas, NM, Vermeire, P, Pride, NB, Paoletti, P, Gibson, J, Howard, P, Yernault, JC, Decramer, M, Higenbottam, T, Postma, DS, et, al.·1995·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. In the European Union, COPD and asthma, together with pneumonia, are the third most common cause of death. In North America, COPD is the fourth leading cause of death, and mortality rates and prevalence are increasing. The major characteristic of COPD is the presence of chronic airflow limitation that progresses slowly over a period of years and is, by definition, largely irreversible. Most patients with COPD are, or were, cigarette smokers. Prevention by reducing the prevalence of smoking remains a priority. Although much of the damage is irreversible at the time of clinical presentation, treatments are available to improve the quality of life, the life expectancy, and perhaps the functional ability of patients with COPD. Several national and international consensus statements on optimal assessment and management of asthma have been published in recent years. These consensus statements have led to international standardization of diagnosis and management and to better care. They also form a basis for clinical audits and suggest areas of future research. However, there have been few attempts to develop consensus guidelines on management of COPD [1, 2]. The European Respiratory Society (ERS) has taken the initiative of producing a consensus statement on COPD. A Task Force of scientists and clinicians was invited to provide this European consensus. The guidelines are intended for use by physicians involved in the care of patients with COPD, and their main goals are to inform health professionals and to reverse a widespread nihilistic approach to the management of these patients. This Task Force firmly believes that treatment can significantly improve the quality and length of life of patients suffering from this chronic, progressive condition. Subcommittees of the Task Force focused on the five main sections of this project: Pathology/Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, Assessment, Treatment, and Management. Experts produced papers within each section, and these papers were brought together by the subcommittee heads. At a plenary meeting held in Wiesbaden, Germany on November 11–13, 1993, all contributions were extensively discussed, and additional working group meetings were arranged. Flowcharts for management in common clinical situations were produced. However, at all stages, members of the Task Force found themselves confronted by unresolved questions and regional differences in management across Europe. A practical approach was adopted, combining established scientific evidence and a consensus view when current data were inadequate. This approach identified more clearly those areas where further research is needed. Comments on drafts of the consensus statement were invited from participants of the original meeting, which included colleagues from North America. The edited document was sent to independent experts for external review. All members had an opportunity to comment on the document at the ERS meeting in Nice on October 2, 1994. As chairmen of the Task Force, we hope that the final document will promote better management of COPD in Europe. We would like to thank all who contributed to it. On behalf of the ERS, we also gratefully acknowledge a generous educational grant from Boehringer Ingelheim and the organizational assistance provided by M.T. Lopez-Vidriero.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.95.08081398

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,592

Metadata

Authors
Siafakas, N., Vermeire, P., Pride, N., Paoletti, P., Gibson, J., Howard, P., Yernault, J., Decramer, M., Higenbottam, T., Postma, D., & et, A.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
1995-08-01
Volume
8
Issue
8
Pages
1398-1420
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W1892949664
Cited by
1,592
References
2
FWCI
45.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.