The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Relating oxygen partial pressure, saturation and content: the haemoglobin–oxygen dissociation curve
Open accessAbstract
Key Points: In clinical practice, the level of arterial oxygenation can be measured either directly by blood gas sampling to measure partial pressure (PaO 2) and percentage saturation (SaO 2) or indirectly by pulse oximetry (SpO 2). This review addresses the strengths and weaknesses of each of these tests and gives advice on their clinical use. The haemoglobin–oxygen dissociation curve describing the relationship between oxygen partial pressure and saturation can be modelled mathematically and routinely obtained clinical data support the accuracy of a historical equation used to describe this relationship. Educational Aims: To understand how oxygen is delivered to the tissues. To understand the relationships between oxygen saturation, partial pressure, content and tissue delivery. The clinical relevance of the haemoglobin–oxygen dissociation curve will be reviewed and we will show how a mathematical model of the curve, derived in the 1960s from limited laboratory data, accurately describes the relationship between oxygen saturation and partial pressure in a large number of routinely obtained clinical samples. To understand the role of pulse oximetry in clinical practice. To understand the differences between arterial, capillary and venous blood gas samples and the role of their measurement in clinical practice. The delivery of oxygen by arterial blood to the tissues of the body has a number of critical determinants including blood oxygen concentration (content), saturation (SO 2) and partial pressure, haemoglobin concentration and cardiac output, including its distribution. The haemoglobin–oxygen dissociation curve, a graphical representation of the relationship between oxygen saturation and oxygen partial pressure helps us to understand some of the principles underpinning this process. Historically this curve was derived from very limited data based on blood samples from small numbers of healthy subjects which were manipulated in vitro and ultimately determined by equations such as those described by Severinghaus in 1979. In a study of 3524 clinical specimens, we found that this equation estimated the SO 2in blood from patients with normal pH and SO 2>70% with remarkable accuracy and, to our knowledge, this is the first large-scale validation of this equation using clinical samples. Oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO 2) is nowadays the standard clinical method for assessing arterial oxygen saturation, providing a convenient, pain-free means of continuously assessing oxygenation, provided the interpreting clinician is aware of important limitations. The use of pulse oximetry reduces the need for arterial blood gas analysis (SaO 2) as many patients who are not at risk of hypercapnic respiratory failure or metabolic acidosis and have acceptable SpO 2do not necessarily require blood gas analysis. While arterial sampling remains the gold-standard method of assessing ventilation and oxygenation, in those patients in whom blood gas analysis is indicated, arterialised capillary samples also have a valuable role in patient care. The clinical role of venous blood gases however remains less well defined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chu, D. K., Kim, L. H.-Y., Young, P. J., Zamiri, N., Almenawer, S. A., Jaeschke, R., Szczeklik, W., Schünemann, H. J., Neary, J. D., & Alhazzani, W. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30479-3 · Cited by 778
Flexible Wearable Sensors for Cardiovascular Health Monitoring
Chen, S., Qi, J., Fan, S., Qiao, Z., Yeo, J. C., & Lim, C. T. (2021) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202100116 · Cited by 453
Cabanas, A. M., Fuentes-Guajardo, M., Latorre, K., León, D., & Martín-Escudero, P. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22093402 · Cited by 124
Wang, J., Qiu, J., Yi, L., Hou, Z., Benardot, D., & Cao, W. (2019) · Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · doi:10.1186/s12970-019-0285-8 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Collins, J.-A., Rudenski, A., Gibson, J., Howard, L., & O’Driscoll, R.
- Venue
- Breathe
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 194-201
- ISSN
- 1810-6838 (ISSN-L)
- 2073-4735
- OpenAlex
- W2169699497
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relating oxygen partial pressure, saturation and content: the haemoglobin–oxygen dissociation curve. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/20734735.001415
- The paper
- Collins, J.-A., Rudenski, A., Gibson, J., Howard, L., & O’Driscoll, R. (2015). Relating oxygen partial pressure, saturation and content: the haemoglobin–oxygen dissociation curve. Breathe. https://doi.org/10.1183/20734735.001415
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.