The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Q: Exploit Hardening Made Easy
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
SOK: (State of) The Art of War: Offensive Techniques in Binary Analysis
Shoshitaishvili, Y., Wang, R., Salls, C., Stephens, N., Polino, M., Dutcher, A., Grosen, J., Feng, S., Hauser, C., Kruegel, C., et al. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2016.17 · Cited by 957
A survey of symbolic execution techniques
Baldoni, R., Coppa, E., D’elia, D. C., Demetrescu, C., & Finocchi, I. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3182657 · Cited by 708
Practical Timing Side Channel Attacks against Kernel Space ASLR
Hund, R., Willems, C., & Holz, T. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2013.23 · Cited by 393
Binary stirring: self-randomizing instruction addresses of legacy x86 binary code
Wartell, R., Mohan, V., Hamlen, K. W., & Lin, Z. (2012) · Proceedings of the 2012 ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/2382196.2382216 · Cited by 323
ROPecker: A Generic and Practical Approach For Defending Against ROP Attacks
Cheng, Y., Zhou, Z., Yu, M., Ding, X., & Deng, R. H. (2014) · Proceedings 2014 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2014.23156 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwartz, E. J., Avgerinos, T., & Brumley, D.
- Published
- 2018-06-29
- Pages
- 25-25
- OpenAlex
- W2123436168
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Q: Exploit Hardening Made Easy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1184/r1/6469187
- The paper
- Schwartz, E. J., Avgerinos, T., & Brumley, D. (2018). Q: Exploit Hardening Made Easy. https://doi.org/10.1184/r1/6469187
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
