Cited by 35Migraine and Headache StudiesTemporomandibular Joint DisordersMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Self-reported headache among the employees of a Swiss university hospital: prevalence, disability, current treatment, and economic impact

Open access
Sokolovic, Emina, Riederer, Franz, Szucs, Thomas, Agosti, Reto, Sándor, Peter Stefan·2013·The Journal of Headache and Pain

Abstract

Background: The objectives of this cross-sectional, observational study were to determine the prevalence of self-reported headache among the employees of the large Swiss university hospital, to measure the impact of headache using the MIDAS questionnaire, to assess current treatment and to estimate economic burden of headache considering indirect costs. Methods: A self-administered questionnaire was distributed internally to 2000 randomly selected employees of the University Hospital Zurich. Results: 1210 employees (60.5%) responded. Of the 1192 (98.5%) employees who provided sufficiently complete information, 723 (61%) reported at least one headache type in the last three months. The prevalence of migraine, and tension-type headache was 20% and 50%, respectively. Regarding the occupational groups, there was a trend that healthcare staff, administration employees, and medical technicians suffered more from headaches than physicians, correcting for age and sex. The economic consequences of lost productivity were calculated to amount to approximately 14 million Swiss Francs (9.5 million EUR), representing 3.2% of the overall annual expenditure of the hospital for personnel. Conclusion: Headache is highly prevalent among university hospital employees, with significant economic impact.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1129-2377-14-29

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The economic costs of headaches are substantial, primarily manifesting as indirect and intangible costs.

    “The economic costs of headaches are substantial, primarily manifesting as indirect and intangible costs. This includes work absences because of headaches (absenteeism), reduced on-the-job performance while experiencing headaches (presenteeism), reduced quality of life, and increased pain outside the workplace [5-7].”

    From Development and Evaluation of a Smartphone-Based Chatbot Coach to Facilitate a Balanced Lifestyle in Individuals With Headaches (BalanceUP App): Randomized Controlled Trial (2024) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Discussion describes a substantial economic burden dominated by indirect costs from absence and reduced effectiveness at work; the Results quantify both. The Background also describes reduced quality of life, but the paper does not classify it or pain as intangible costs, nor does it report increased pain outside the workplace. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sokolovic, E., Riederer, F., Szucs, T., Agosti, R., & Sándor, P. S.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Klinik Hirslanden (CH)
Corresponding author
Riederer, Franz
Venue
The Journal of Headache and Pain
Published
2013-03-26
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
29-29
ISSN
  • 1129-2369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1129-2377
OpenAlex
W2167916207
Cited by
35
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Headache and Pain (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
headache prevalence, university hospital staff, migraine, tension-type headache, MIDAS questionnaire, disability, headache treatment, economic burden, productivity loss, indirect costs, healthcare workers
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Disability Evaluation, Efficiency, Female, Headache, Health Personnel, Hospitals, University, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Switzerland, Prevalence, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review