The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The use of genomic selection in breeding programs may increase the rate of genetic improvement, reduce the generation time, and provide higher accuracy of estimated breeding values (EBVs). A number of different methods have been developed for genomic prediction of breeding values, but many of them assume that all animals have been genotyped. In practice, not all animals are genotyped, and the methods have to be adapted to this situation. RESULTS: In this paper we provide an extension of a linear mixed model method for genomic prediction to the situation with non-genotyped animals. The model specifies that a breeding value is the sum of a genomic and a polygenic genetic random effect, where genomic genetic random effects are correlated with a genomic relationship matrix constructed from markers and the polygenic genetic random effects are correlated with the usual relationship matrix. The extension of the model to non-genotyped animals is made by using the pedigree to derive an extension of the genomic relationship matrix to non-genotyped animals. As a result, in the extended model the estimated breeding values are obtained by blending the information used to compute traditional EBVs and the information used to compute purely genomic EBVs. Parameters in the model are estimated using average information REML and estimated breeding values are best linear unbiased predictions (BLUPs). The method is illustrated using a simulated data set. CONCLUSIONS: The extension of the method to non-genotyped animals presented in this paper makes it possible to integrate all the genomic, pedigree and phenotype information into a one-step procedure for genomic prediction. Such a one-step procedure results in more accurate estimated breeding values and has the potential to become the standard tool for genomic prediction of breeding values in future practical evaluations in pig and cattle breeding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficient Methods to Compute Genomic Predictions
VanRaden, P. M. (2008) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0980 · Cited by 6,050
Gianola, D., & van Kaam, J. B. C. H. M. (2008) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.107.084285 · Cited by 457
Cited by
Genome-wide association mapping including phenotypes from relatives without genotypes
WANG, H., MISZTAL, I., AGUILAR, I., LEGARRA, A., & MUIR, W. M. (2012) · Genetics Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672312000274 · Cited by 632
Harnessing genomic information for livestock improvement
Georges, M., Charlier, C., & Hayes, B. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0082-2 · Cited by 384
Accelerating Improvement of Livestock with Genomic Selection
Meuwissen, T., Hayes, B., & Goddard, M. (2013) · Annual Review of Animal Biosciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103705 · Cited by 339
Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs
Christensen, O. F., Madsen, P., Nielsen, B., Ostersen, T., & Su, G. (2012) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731112000742 · Cited by 306
Self-citationGenetic evaluation including intermediate omics features
Christensen, O. F., Börner, V., Varona, L., & Legarra, A. (2021) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyab130 · Cited by 81
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Christensen, O. F., & Lund, M. S.
- Venue
- Genetics Selection Evolution
- Published
- 2010-01-27
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-2
- ISSN
- 0999-193X (ISSN-L)
- 1297-9686
- OpenAlex
- W2142220815
- Cited by
- 903
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1297-9686-42-2
- The paper
- Christensen, O. F., & Lund, M. S. (2010). Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped. Genetics Selection Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-42-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.