The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical use of exhaled volatile organic compounds in pulmonary diseases: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
There is an increasing interest in the potential of exhaled biomarkers, such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs), to improve accurate diagnoses and management decisions in pulmonary diseases. The objective of this manuscript is to systematically review the current knowledge on exhaled VOCs with respect to their potential clinical use in asthma, lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis (CF), and respiratory tract infections. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane database, and reference lists of retrieved studies. Controlled, clinical, English-language studies exploring the diagnostic and monitoring value of VOCs in asthma, COPD, CF, lung cancer and respiratory tract infections were included. Data on study design, setting, participant characteristics, VOCs techniques, and outcome measures were extracted. Seventy-three studies were included, counting in total 3,952 patients and 2,973 healthy controls. The collection and analysis of exhaled VOCs is non-invasive and could be easily applied in the broad range of patients, including subjects with severe disease and children. Various research groups demonstrated that VOCs profiles could accurately distinguish patients with a pulmonary disease from healthy controls. Pulmonary diseases seem to be characterized by a disease specific breath-print, as distinct profiles were found in patients with dissimilar diseases. The heterogeneity of studies challenged the inter-laboratory comparability. In conclusion, profiles of VOCs are potentially able to accurately diagnose various pulmonary diseases. Despite these promising findings, multiple challenges such as further standardization and validation of the diverse techniques need to be mastered before VOCs can be applied into clinical practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 · Cited by 19,575
Vestbo, J., Hurd, S. S., Agustí, A. G., Jones, P. W., Vogelmeier, C., Anzueto, A., Barnes, P. J., Fabbri, L. M., Martinez, F. J., Nishimura, M., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201204-0596pp · Cited by 15,983
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Ward, E., Hao, Y., Xu, J., & Thun, M. J. (2009) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20006 · Cited by 9,709
Rabe, K. F., Hurd, S., Anzueto, A., Barnes, P. J., Buist, S. A., Calverley, P., Fukuchi, Y., Jenkins, C., Rodriguez-Roisin, R., van Weel, C., et al. (2007) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200703-456so · Cited by 4,925
Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary
Bateman, E. D., Hurd, S. S., Barnes, P. J., Bousquet, J., Drazen, J. M., FitzGerald, M., Gibson, P., Ohta, K., O'Byrne, P., Pedersen, S. E., et al. (2008) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00138707 · Cited by 3,203
Exhaled breath condensate: methodological recommendations and unresolved questions
Horváth, I., Hunt, J., & Barnes, P. J. (2005) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00029705 · Cited by 1,284
Cited by
A European Respiratory Society technical standard: exhaled biomarkers in lung disease
Horváth, I., Barnes, P. J., Loukides, S., Sterk, P. J., Högman, M., Olin, A.-C., Amann, A., Antus, B., Baraldi, E., Bikov, A., et al. (2017) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/13993003.00965-2016 · Cited by 638
Self-citationVolatile Organic Compounds in Exhaled Breath as Fingerprints of Lung Cancer, Asthma and COPD
Ratiu, I. A., Ligor, T., Bocos-Bintintan, V., Mayhew, C. A., & Buszewski, B. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm10010032 · Cited by 320
The Metabolic Theory of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Paulin, R., & Michelakis, E. D. (2014) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.115.301130 · Cited by 314
Breath Analysis as a Potential and Non-Invasive Frontier in Disease Diagnosis: An Overview
Pereira, J., Porto-Figueira, P., Cavaco, C., Taunk, K., Rapole, S., Dhakne, R., Nagarajaram, H., & Câmara, J. (2015) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo5010003 · Cited by 301
VOC breath biomarkers in lung cancer
Saalberg, Y., & Wolff, M. (2016) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cca.2016.05.013 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- van de Kant, K. D., van der Sande, L. J., Jöbsis, Q., van Schayck, O. C., & Dompeling, E.
- Venue
- Respiratory Research
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 117
- ISSN
- 1465-9921 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2128242805
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 1.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical use of exhaled volatile organic compounds in pulmonary diseases: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1465-9921-13-117
- The paper
- van de Kant, K. D., van der Sande, L. J., Jöbsis, Q., van Schayck, O. C., & Dompeling, E. (2012). Clinical use of exhaled volatile organic compounds in pulmonary diseases: a systematic review. Respiratory Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-13-117
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.