The DOI matches its Crossref record.
MPN+, a putative catalytic motif found in a subset of MPN domain proteins from eukaryotes and prokaryotes, is critical for Rpn11 function
Open accessAbstract
BackgroundThree macromolecular assemblages, the lid complex of the proteasome, the COP9-Signalosome (CSN) and the eIF3 complex, all consist of multiple proteins harboring MPN and PCI domains. Up to now, no specific function for any of these proteins has been defined, nor has the importance of these motifs been elucidated. In particular Rpn11, a lid subunit, serves as the paradigm for MPN-containing proteins as it is highly conserved and important for proteasome function.ResultsWe have identified a sequence motif, termed the MPN+ motif, which is highly conserved in a subset of MPN domain proteins such as Rpn11 and Csn5/Jab1, but is not present outside of this subfamily. The MPN+ motif consists of five polar residues that resemble the active site residues of hydrolytic enzyme classes, particularly that of metalloproteases. By using site-directed mutagenesis, we show that the MPN+ residues are important for the function of Rpn11, while a highly conserved Cys residue outside of the MPN+ motif is not essential. Single amino acid substitutions in MPN+ residues all show similar phenotypes, including slow growth, sensitivity to temperature and amino acid analogs, and general proteasome-dependent proteolysis defects.ConclusionsThe MPN+ motif is abundant in certain MPN-domain proteins, including newly identified proteins of eukaryotes, bacteria and archaea thought to act outside of the traditional large PCI/MPN complexes. The putative catalytic nature of the MPN+ motif makes it a good candidate for a pivotal enzymatic function, possibly a proteasome-associated deubiquitinating activity and a CSN-associated Nedd8/Rub1-removing activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Breaking the chains: structure and function of the deubiquitinases
Komander, D., Clague, M. J., & Urbé, S. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2731 · Cited by 1,969
Recognition and Processing of Ubiquitin-Protein Conjugates by the Proteasome
Finley, D. (2009) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.081507.101607 · Cited by 1,764
Structure and Function of the 26S Proteasome
Bard, J. A. M., Goodall, E. A., Greene, E. R., Jonsson, E., Dong, K. C., & Martin, A. (2018) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-011931 · Cited by 819
Deubiquitylases From Genes to Organism
Clague, M. J., Barsukov, I., Coulson, J. M., Liu, H., Rigden, D. J., & Urbé, S. (2013) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00002.2013 · Cited by 425
Zhu, P., Zhou, W., Wang, J., Puc, J., Ohgi, K. A., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst, P., Glass, C. K., & Rosenfeld, M. G. (2007) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.024 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- Maytal-Kivity, V., Reis, N., Hofmann, K., & Glickman, M. H.
- Venue
- BMC Biochemistry
- Published
- 2002-09-20
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-28
- ISSN
- 1471-2091 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1552171878
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MPN+, a putative catalytic motif found in a subset of MPN domain proteins from eukaryotes and prokaryotes, is critical for Rpn11 function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2091-3-28
- The paper
- Maytal-Kivity, V., Reis, N., Hofmann, K., & Glickman, M. H. (2002). MPN+, a putative catalytic motif found in a subset of MPN domain proteins from eukaryotes and prokaryotes, is critical for Rpn11 function. BMC Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2091-3-28
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.