The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RRW: repeated random walks on genome-scale protein networks for local cluster discovery
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: We propose an efficient and biologically sensitive algorithm based on repeated random walks (RRW) for discovering functional modules, e.g., complexes and pathways, within large-scale protein networks. Compared to existing cluster identification techniques, RRW implicitly makes use of network topology, edge weights, and long range interactions between proteins. RESULTS: We apply the proposed technique on a functional network of yeast genes and accurately identify statistically significant clusters of proteins. We validate the biological significance of the results using known complexes in the MIPS complex catalogue database and well-characterized biological processes. We find that 90% of the created clusters have the majority of their catalogued proteins belonging to the same MIPS complex, and about 80% have the majority of their proteins involved in the same biological process. We compare our method to various other clustering techniques, such as the Markov Clustering Algorithm (MCL), and find a significant improvement in the RRW clusters' precision and accuracy values. CONCLUSION: RRW, which is a technique that exploits the topology of the network, is more precise and robust in finding local clusters. In addition, it has the added flexibility of being able to find multi-functional proteins by allowing overlapping clusters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome
Ito, T., Chiba, T., Ozawa, R., Yoshida, M., Hattori, M., & Sakaki, Y. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.061034498 · Cited by 3,566
Cited by
Detecting overlapping protein complexes in protein-protein interaction networks
Nepusz, T., Yu, H., & Paccanaro, A. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1938 · Cited by 1,245
Network propagation: a universal amplifier of genetic associations
Cowen, L., Ideker, T., Raphael, B. J., & Sharan, R. (2017) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.38 · Cited by 657
Sun, J., Shi, H., Wang, Z., Zhang, C., Liu, L., Wang, L., He, W., Hao, D., Liu, S., & Zhou, M. (2014) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/c3mb70608g · Cited by 289
Compact integration of multi-network topology for functional analysis of genes
Cho, H., Berger, B., & Peng, J. (2016) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2016.10.017 · Cited by 241
Metadata
- Authors
- Macropol, K., Can, T., & Singh, A. K.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2009-09-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 283-283
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057793636
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RRW: repeated random walks on genome-scale protein networks for local cluster discovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-10-283
- The paper
- Macropol, K., Can, T., & Singh, A. K. (2009). RRW: repeated random walks on genome-scale protein networks for local cluster discovery. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-283
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.