The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Disease candidate gene identification and prioritization using protein interaction networks
Open accessAbstract
Background: Although most of the current disease candidate gene identification and prioritization methods depend on functional annotations, the coverage of the gene functional annotations is a limiting factor. In the current study, we describe a candidate gene prioritization method that is entirely based on protein-protein interaction network (PPIN) analyses. Results: For the first time, extended versions of the PageRank and HITS algorithms, and the K-Step Markov method are applied to prioritize disease candidate genes in a training-test schema. Using a list of known disease-related genes from our earlier study as a training set ("seeds"), and the rest of the known genes as a test list, we perform large-scale cross validation to rank the candidate genes and also evaluate and compare the performance of our approach. Under appropriate settings – for example, a back probability of 0.3 for PageRank with Priors and HITS with Priors, and step size 6 for K-Step Markov method – the three methods achieved a comparable AUC value, suggesting a similar performance. Conclusion: Even though network-based methods are generally not as effective as integrated functional annotation-based methods for disease candidate gene prioritization, in a one-to-one comparison, PPIN-based candidate gene prioritization performs better than all other gene features or annotations. Additionally, we demonstrate that methods used for studying both social and Web networks can be successfully used for disease candidate gene prioritization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cytoscape: A software Environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks
Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S., Wang, J. T., Ramage, D., Amin, N., Schwikowski, B., & Ideker, T. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1239303 · Cited by 51,888
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
(1999) · Cited by 12,854
A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness
Freeman, L. C. (1977) · Sociometry · doi:10.2307/3033543 · Cited by 10,295
Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment
Kleinberg, J. M. (1999) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/324133.324140 · Cited by 8,959
Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), a knowledgebase of human genes and genetic disorders
Hamosh, A. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki033 · Cited by 3,420
Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein–protein interaction network
Rual, J.-F., Venkatesan, K., Hao, T., Hirozane-Kishikawa, T., Dricot, A., Li, N., Berriz, G. F., Gibbons, F. D., Dreze, M., Ayivi-Guedehoussou, N., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04209 · Cited by 2,933
The Centrality Index of a Graph
Sabidussi, G. (1966) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289527 · Cited by 2,476
A Human Protein-Protein Interaction Network: A Resource for Annotating the Proteome
Stelzl, U., Worm, U., Lalowski, M., Haenig, C., Brembeck, F. H., Goehler, H., Stroedicke, M., Zenkner, M., Schoenherr, A., Koeppen, S., et al. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.029 · Cited by 2,387
Cited by
ToppGene Suite for gene list enrichment analysis and candidate gene prioritization
Chen, J., Bardes, E. E., Aronow, B. J., & Jegga, A. G. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp427 · Cited by 2,952
Self-citationStructure and dynamics of molecular networks: A novel paradigm of drug discovery
Csermely, P., Korcsmáros, T., Kiss, H. J. M., London, G., & Nussinov, R. (2013) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.01.016 · Cited by 892
Leaders in Social Networks, the Delicious Case
Lü, L., Zhang, Y.-C., Yeung, C. H., & Zhou, T. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021202 · Cited by 871
Prioritizing candidate disease genes by network-based boosting of genome-wide association data
Lee, I., Blom, U. M., Wang, P. I., Shim, J. E., & Marcotte, E. M. (2011) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.118992.110 · Cited by 686
Network propagation: a universal amplifier of genetic associations
Cowen, L., Ideker, T., Raphael, B. J., & Sharan, R. (2017) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.38 · Cited by 657
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, J., Aronow, B. J., & Jegga, A. G.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2009-02-27
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-73
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099656145
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 11.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disease candidate gene identification and prioritization using protein interaction networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-10-73
- The paper
- Chen, J., Aronow, B. J., & Jegga, A. G. (2009). Disease candidate gene identification and prioritization using protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-73
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.