Cited by 97Genetic diversity and population structureForensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

PCA-based population structure inference with generic clustering algorithms

Open access
Lee, Chih, Abdool, Ali, Huang, Chun-Hsi·2009·BMC Bioinformatics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Handling genotype data typed at hundreds of thousands of loci is very time-consuming and it is no exception for population structure inference. Therefore, we propose to apply PCA to the genotype data of a population, select the significant principal components using the Tracy-Widom distribution, and assign the individuals to one or more subpopulations using generic clustering algorithms. RESULTS: We investigated K-means, soft K-means and spectral clustering and made comparison to STRUCTURE, a model-based algorithm specifically designed for population structure inference. Moreover, we investigated methods for predicting the number of subpopulations in a population. The results on four simulated datasets and two real datasets indicate that our approach performs comparably well to STRUCTURE. For the simulated datasets, STRUCTURE and soft K-means with BIC produced identical predictions on the number of subpopulations. We also showed that, for real dataset, BIC is a better index than likelihood in predicting the number of subpopulations. CONCLUSION: Our approach has the advantage of being fast and scalable, while STRUCTURE is very time-consuming because of the nature of MCMC in parameter estimation. Therefore, we suggest choosing the proper algorithm based on the application of population structure inference.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2105-10-s1-s73

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, C., Abdool, A., & Huang, C.-H.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
  • Lee, Chih
  • Huang, Chun-Hsi
Venue
BMC Bioinformatics
Published
2009-01
Volume
10
Issue
S1
Pages
S73-S73
ISSN
1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975612392
Cited by
97
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0755373)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
population structure inference, principal component analysis, genotype data, Tracy-Widom distribution, clustering algorithms, K-means clustering, spectral clustering, structural comparison, Bayesian information criterion, likelihood comparison, scalability
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Genetics, Population, Genotype, Humans, Genome, Human, Cluster Analysis, Population Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review