The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AntiBP2: improved version of antibacterial peptide prediction
Open accessAbstract
Background: Antibacterial peptides are one of the effecter molecules of innate immune system. Over the last few decades several antibacterial peptides have successfully approved as drug by FDA, which has prompted an interest in these antibacterial peptides. In our recent study we analyzed 999 antibacterial peptides, which were collected from Antibacterial Peptide Database (APD). We have also developed methods to predict and classify these antibacterial peptides using Support Vector Machine (SVM). Results: During analysis we observed that certain residues are preferred over other in antibacterial peptide, particularly at the N and C terminus. These observation and increased data of antibacterial peptide in APD encouraged us to again develop a new and more robust method for predicting antibacterial peptides in protein from their amino acid sequence or given peptide have antibacterial properties or not. First, the binary patterns of the 15 N terminus residues were used for predicting antibacterial peptide using SVM and achieved accuracy of 85.46% with 0.705 Mathew's Correlation Coefficient (MCC). Then we used the binary pattern of 15 C terminus residues and achieved accuracy of 85.05% with 0.701 MCC, latter on we developed prediction method by combining N & C terminus and achieved an accuracy of 91.64% with 0.831 MCC. Finally we developed SVM based model using amino acid composition of whole peptide and achieved 92.14% accuracy with MCC 0.843. In this study we used five-fold cross validation technique to develop all these models and tested the performance of these models on an independent dataset. We further classify antibacterial peptides according to their sources and achieved an overall accuracy of 98.95%. We further classify antibacterial peptides in their respective family and got a satisfactory result. Conclusion: Among antibacterial peptides, there is preference for certain residues at N and C terminus, which helps to discriminate them from non-antibacterial peptides. Amino acid composition of antibacterial peptides helps to demarcate them from non-antibacterial peptide and their further classification in source and family. Antibp2 will be helpful in discovering efficacious antibacterial peptide, which we hope will be helpful against antibiotics resistant bacteria. We also developed user friendly web server for the biological community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Defensins: antimicrobial peptides of innate immunity
Ganz, T. (2003) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1180 · Cited by 3,066
Anti-microbial peptides: from invertebrates to vertebrates
Bulet, P., Stöcklin, R., & Menin, L. (2004) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0124.x · Cited by 1,107
Cationic peptides: effectors in innate immunity and novel antimicrobials
Hancock, R. E. (2001) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(01)00092-5 · Cited by 978 · cited 1×
“In the past few decades, a large number of bacterial strains have evolved ways to adapt or become resistant to the currently available antibiotic [1].”
BackgroundCationic Antimicrobial Peptides: Issues for Potential Clinical Use
Bradshaw, J. P. (2003) · BioDrugs · doi:10.2165/00063030-200317040-00002 · Cited by 293
Cited by
Mooney, C., Haslam, N. J., Pollastri, G., & Shields, D. C. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045012 · Cited by 615
Deep learning improves antimicrobial peptide recognition
Veltri, D., Kamath, U., & Shehu, A. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty179 · Cited by 593
Meher, P. K., Sahu, T. K., Saini, V., & Rao, A. R. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep42362 · Cited by 516
Bhadra, P., Yan, J., Li, J., Fong, S., & Siu, S. W. I. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-19752-w · Cited by 339
AVPpred: collection and prediction of highly effective antiviral peptides.
Thakur, N., Qureshi, A., & Kumar, M. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks450 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Lata, S., Mishra, N. K., & Raghava, G. P.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S19-S19
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2112862199
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AntiBP2: improved version of antibacterial peptide prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-11-s1-s19
- The paper
- Lata, S., Mishra, N. K., & Raghava, G. P. (2010). AntiBP2: improved version of antibacterial peptide prediction. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-s1-s19
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.