The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Content-rich biological network constructed by mining PubMed abstracts
Open accessAbstract
Background: The integration of the rapidly expanding corpus of information about the genome, transcriptome, and proteome, engendered by powerful technological advances, such as microarrays, and the availability of genomic sequence from multiple species, challenges the grasp and comprehension of the scientific community. Despite the existence of text-mining methods that identify biological relationships based on the textual co-occurrence of gene/protein terms or similarities in abstract texts, knowledge of the underlying molecular connections on a large scale, which is prerequisite to understanding novel biological processes, lags far behind the accumulation of data. While computationally efficient, the co-occurrence-based approaches fail to characterize (e.g., inhibition or stimulation, directionality) biological interactions. Programs with natural language processing (NLP) capability have been created to address these limitations, however, they are in general not readily accessible to the public. Results: We present a NLP-based text-mining approach, Chilibot, which constructs content-rich relationship networks among biological concepts, genes, proteins, or drugs. Amongst its features, suggestions for new hypotheses can be generated. Lastly, we provide evidence that the connectivity of molecular networks extracted from the biological literature follows the power-law distribution, indicating scale-free topologies consistent with the results of previous experimental analyses. Conclusions: Chilibot distills scientific relationships from knowledge available throughout a wide range of biological domains and presents these in a content-rich graphical format, thus integrating general biomedical knowledge with the specialized knowledge and interests of the user. Chilibot http://www.chilibot.net can be accessed free of charge to academic users.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lethality and centrality in protein networks
Jeong, H., Mason, S. P., Barabási, A.-L., & Oltvai, Z. N. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35075138 · Cited by 5,287
The Large-Scale Organization of Metabolic Networks
Jeong, H., Tombor, B., Albert, R., Oltvai, Z. N., & Barabási, A.-L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35036627 · Cited by 4,972
TNF-R1 Signaling: A Beautiful Pathway
Chen, G., & Goeddel, D. V. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1071924 · Cited by 1,927
BIND--The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database
Bader, G. D. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.1.242 · Cited by 1,560
TnT: a statistical part-of-speech tagger
Brants, T. (2000) · Proceedings of the sixth conference on Applied natural language processing - · doi:10.3115/974147.974178 · Cited by 1,329
Inhibition of Postsynaptic PKC or CaMKII Blocks Induction But Not Expression of LTP
Malinow, R., Schulman, H., & Tsien, R. W. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2549638 · Cited by 1,325
GENIA corpus—a semantically annotated corpus for bio-textmining
Kim, J.-D., Ohta, T., Tateisi, Y., & Tsujii, J. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1023 · Cited by 1,232
DIP: the Database of Interacting Proteins
Xenarios, I. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.289 · Cited by 1,123
BIND: the Biomolecular Interaction Network Database
Bader, G. D. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkg056 · Cited by 1,114
The small world inside large metabolic networks
Wagner, A., & Fell, D. A. (2001) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1711 · Cited by 981
Cited by
The Joint Graphical Lasso for Inverse Covariance Estimation Across Multiple Classes
Danaher, P., Wang, P., & Witten, D. M. (2014) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/rssb.12033 · Cited by 855
A Systems Level Analysis of Transcriptional Changes in Alzheimer's Disease and Normal Aging
Miller, J. A., Oldham, M. C., & Geschwind, D. H. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4098-07.2008 · Cited by 385
Autophagy and Alzheimer’s Disease: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Implications
Uddin, M. S., Stachowiak, A., Mamun, A. A., Tzvetkov, N. T., Takeda, S., Atanasov, A. G., Bergantin, L. B., Abdel-Daim, M. M., & Stankiewicz, A. M. (2018) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2018.00004 · Cited by 395
Corpus annotation for mining biomedical events from literature
Kim, J.-D., Ohta, T., & Tsujii, J. (2008) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-10 · Cited by 395
Özgür, A., Vu, T., Erkan, G., & Radev, D. R. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn182 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, H., & Sharp, B. M.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2004-10-08
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 147-147
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1623698862
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 4.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Content-rich biological network constructed by mining PubMed abstracts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-5-147
- The paper
- Chen, H., & Sharp, B. M. (2004). Content-rich biological network constructed by mining PubMed abstracts. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-5-147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.