The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A methodology for the structural and functional analysis of signaling and regulatory networks
Open accessAbstract
Background: Structural analysis of cellular interaction networks contributes to a deeper understanding of network-wide interdependencies, causal relationships, and basic functional capabilities. While the structural analysis of metabolic networks is a well-established field, similar methodologies have been scarcely developed and applied to signaling and regulatory networks. Results: We propose formalisms and methods, relying on adapted and partially newly introduced approaches, which facilitate a structural analysis of signaling and regulatory networks with focus on functional aspects. We use two different formalisms to represent and analyze interaction networks: interaction graphs and (logical) interaction hypergraphs. We show that, in interaction graphs, the determination of feedback cycles and of all the signaling paths between any pair of species is equivalent to the computation of elementary modes known from metabolic networks. Knowledge on the set of signaling paths and feedback loops facilitates the computation of intervention strategies and the classification of compounds into activators, inhibitors, ambivalent factors, and non-affecting factors with respect to a certain species. In some cases, qualitative effects induced by perturbations can be unambiguously predicted from the network scheme. Interaction graphs however, are not able to capture AND relationships which do frequently occur in interaction networks. The consequent logical concatenation of all the arcs pointing into a species leads to Boolean networks. For a Boolean representation of cellular interaction networks we propose a formalism based on logical (or signed) interaction hypergraphs, which facilitates in particular a logical steady state analysis (LSSA). LSSA enables studies on the logical processing of signals and the identification of optimal intervention points (targets) in cellular networks. LSSA also reveals network regions whose parametrization and initial states are crucial for the dynamic behavior. We have implemented these methods in our software tool CellNetAnalyzer (successor of FluxAnalyzer) and illustrate their applicability using a logical model of T-Cell receptor signaling providing non-intuitive results regarding feedback loops, essential elements, and (logical) signal processing upon different stimuli. Conclusion: The methods and formalisms we propose herein are another step towards the comprehensive functional analysis of cellular interaction networks. Their potential, shown on a realistic T-cell signaling model, makes them a promising tool.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cell Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases
Lemmon, M. A., & Schlessinger, J. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.011 · Cited by 7,929
Lethality and centrality in protein networks
Jeong, H., Mason, S. P., Barabási, A.-L., & Oltvai, Z. N. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35075138 · Cited by 5,287
Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets
Kauffman, S. A. (1969) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(69)90015-0 · Cited by 4,819
Cell Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases
Schlessinger, J. (2000) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00114-8 · Cited by 3,774
Bollobás, B. (1998) · Graduate Texts in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0619-4 · Cited by 3,772
Combinatorial optimization: networks and matroids
Lawler, E. L. (2021) · Cited by 3,359
Modeling and Simulation of Genetic Regulatory Systems: A Literature Review
de Jong, H. (2002) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/10665270252833208 · Cited by 2,663
Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality
Newman, M. E. J. (2001) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.64.016132 · Cited by 2,613
Causal Protein-Signaling Networks Derived from Multiparameter Single-Cell Data
Sachs, K., Perez, O., Pe'er, D., Lauffenburger, D. A., & Nolan, G. P. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1105809 · Cited by 1,708
The Regulation of Cellular Systems
Heinrich, R., & Schuster, S. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-1161-4 · Cited by 1,193
Cited by
A Logical Model Provides Insights into T Cell Receptor Signaling
Saez-Rodriguez, J., Simeoni, L., Lindquist, J. A., Hemenway, R., Bommhardt, U., Arndt, B., Haus, U.-U., Weismantel, R., Gilles, E. D., Klamt, S., et al. (2007) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030163 · Cited by 352
Self-citationLogic-Based Models for the Analysis of Cell Signaling Networks
Morris, M. K., Saez-Rodriguez, J., Sorger, P. K., & Lauffenburger, D. A. (2010) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi902202q · Cited by 332
Self-citationSynchronous versus asynchronous modeling of gene regulatory networks
Garg, A., Di Cara, A., Xenarios, I., Mendoza, L., & De Micheli, G. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn336 · Cited by 305
Modeling formalisms in Systems Biology
Machado, D., Costa, R. S., Rocha, M., Ferreira, E. C., Tidor, B., & Rocha, I. (2011) · AMB Express · doi:10.1186/2191-0855-1-45 · Cited by 189
A comprehensive modular map of molecular interactions in RB/E2F pathway
Calzone, L., Gelay, A., Zinovyev, A., Radvanyi, F., & Barillot, E. (2008) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb.2008.7 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Klamt, S., Saez-Rodriguez, J., Lindquist, J. A., Simeoni, L., & Gilles, E. D.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2006-02-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-56
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1807981783
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 7.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A methodology for the structural and functional analysis of signaling and regulatory networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-7-56
- The paper
- Klamt, S., Saez-Rodriguez, J., Lindquist, J. A., Simeoni, L., & Gilles, E. D. (2006). A methodology for the structural and functional analysis of signaling and regulatory networks. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-56
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.