The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of MHC class II binding affinity using SMM-align, a novel stabilization matrix alignment method
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Antigen presenting cells (APCs) sample the extra cellular space and present peptides from here to T helper cells, which can be activated if the peptides are of foreign origin. The peptides are presented on the surface of the cells in complex with major histocompatibility class II (MHC II) molecules. Identification of peptides that bind MHC II molecules is thus a key step in rational vaccine design and developing methods for accurate prediction of the peptide:MHC interactions play a central role in epitope discovery. The MHC class II binding groove is open at both ends making the correct alignment of a peptide in the binding groove a crucial part of identifying the core of an MHC class II binding motif. Here, we present a novel stabilization matrix alignment method, SMM-align, that allows for direct prediction of peptide:MHC binding affinities. The predictive performance of the method is validated on a large MHC class II benchmark data set covering 14 HLA-DR (human MHC) and three mouse H2-IA alleles. RESULTS: The predictive performance of the SMM-align method was demonstrated to be superior to that of the Gibbs sampler, TEPITOPE, SVRMHC, and MHCpred methods. Cross validation between peptide data set obtained from different sources demonstrated that direct incorporation of peptide length potentially results in over-fitting of the binding prediction method. Focusing on amino terminal peptide flanking residues (PFR), we demonstrate a consistent gain in predictive performance by favoring binding registers with a minimum PFR length of two amino acids. Visualizing the binding motif as obtained by the SMM-align and TEPITOPE methods highlights a series of fundamental discrepancies between the two predicted motifs. For the DRB1*1302 allele for instance, the TEPITOPE method favors basic amino acids at most anchor positions, whereas the SMM-align method identifies a preference for hydrophobic or neutral amino acids at the anchors. CONCLUSION: The SMM-align method was shown to outperform other state of the art MHC class II prediction methods. The method predicts quantitative peptide:MHC binding affinity values, making it ideally suited for rational epitope discovery. The method has been trained and evaluated on the, to our knowledge, largest benchmark data set publicly available and covers the nine HLA-DR supertypes suggested as well as three mouse H2-IA allele. Both the peptide benchmark data set, and SMM-align prediction method (NetMHCII) are made publicly available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
Cited by
IEDB-AR: immune epitope database-analysis resource in 2019
Dhanda, S. K., Mahajan, S., Paul, S., Yan, Z., Kim, H., Jespersen, M. C., Jurtz, V., Andreatta, M., Greenbaum, J. A., Marcatili, P., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz452 · Cited by 427
Varrin‐Doyer, M., Spencer, C. M., Schulze‐Topphoff, U., Nelson, P. A., Stroud, R. M., C. Cree, B. A., & Zamvil, S. S. (2012) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.23651 · Cited by 341
Landscape of tumor-infiltrating T cell repertoire of human cancers
Li, B., Li, T., Pignon, J.-C., Wang, B., Wang, J., Shukla, S. A., Dou, R., Chen, Q., Hodi, F. S., Choueiri, T. K., et al. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3581 · Cited by 306
Zinsli, L. V., Stierlin, N., Loessner, M. J., & Schmelcher, M. (2021) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.12.024 · Cited by 63
Chen, X., Hickling, T., & Vicini, P. (2014) · CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology · doi:10.1038/psp.2014.31 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Nielsen, M., Lundegaard, C., & Lund, O.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2007-07-04
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 238-238
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099500226
- Cited by
- 594
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of MHC class II binding affinity using SMM-align, a novel stabilization matrix alignment method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-8-238
- The paper
- Nielsen, M., Lundegaard, C., & Lund, O. (2007). Prediction of MHC class II binding affinity using SMM-align, a novel stabilization matrix alignment method. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-238
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.